1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anastassius [24]
3 years ago
9

match each economist to his economic belief. tiles adam smith friedrich von hayek milton friedman john maynard keynes pairs less

government intervention gives people more economic freedom. arrowboth government should not control the money supply. arrowboth government intervention is necessary for stability. arrowboth competition is a regulatory force. arrowboth nextreset
Social Studies
2 answers:
yulyashka [42]3 years ago
7 0

The correct matches are the following.

Adam Smith. Competition is a regulatory force.

Friedrich von Hayek. Less government intervention gives people more economic freedom.

Milton Friedman. The government should not control the money supply.

John Maynard Keynes. Government intervention is necessary for stability.

Here, we are talking about renown economists that established important concepts on economics and the role the government should play in the face of different scenarios.

Adam Smith wrote the book "The Wealth of Nations" in 1776, where he expressed ideas that supported competition in open markets. In "Capitalism and Freedom," Milton Friedman supported the idea that the money supply should be free of government control. John Maynard Keynes believed that it was necessary for the intervention of the government to promote the economy of a country. Many countries in Latin America have followed his advice and create social programs to help the ones in need. On the contrary, Friedrich von Hayek established in "The Road to Serfdom," that the best way to help people invest is that the government stayed out of any kind of control. This way they would be freer to create wealth.

dsp733 years ago
4 0

1. Friedrich von Hayek ------------Less government intervention gives  people more economic freedom.

To Hayek, less government intervention implied more economic freedom. He trusted that when individuals are allowed to pick, the economy runs all the more proficiently. In the United States, the most grounded supporters of Hayek's thoughts were a gathering of business analysts at the University of Chicago. Known as the "Chicago School of Economics," this inexactly shaped, informal gathering of financial specialists was for the most part connected with free market libertarianism. The name alludes to financial specialists who got their tutoring in the Economics Department at the University of Chicago. To date, almost 50% of all Nobel Prizes in Economics have been won by analysts with connections to Chicago.  


2. Milton Friedman ---------Government should not control the  money supply.

Milton Friedman saw the 1920s as years of indispensable and sustainable growth in the economy. Amid this period the Federal Reserve outstandingly extended the cash supply. This development was not reflected in an expansion in the normal cost level, on the grounds that fiscal powers were killed by simultaneous increments in efficiency.  


3. John Maynard Keynes ----------Government intervention is necessary  for stability.

John Maynard Keynes made the hypothetical contentions for another kind of monetary system: government intervention used to smooth out the business cycle. Keynes died in 1946, yet his thoughts made the Keynesian school of financial aspects and prompted the improvement of macroeconomics. Keynes' belief system overwhelmed the financial worldview from 1945 until the late 1970s. As indicated by Keynes, free markets don't generally contain self-adjusting components; some of the time government intervention is important to limit downturns and advance development. He trusted that without state help, the blasts and busts in the business cycle could winding wild.


4. Adam Smith ------------Competition is a regulatory force.


A market economy is a monetary framework in which people claim the greater part of the assets - land, work, and capital - and control their utilization through willful choices made in the commercial center. It is a framework in which the legislature assumes a little role. In this kind of economy, two powers - self-interest and competition - assume a critical job. The role of self interest and competition was depicted by financial specialist Adam Smith more than 200 years prior and still fills in as basic to our comprehension of how showcase economies work.  

You might be interested in
Explain how economists use the term “guns or butter¨
allochka39001 [22]
Guns and butter generally refers to the dynamics involved in a federal government's allocations to defense versus social programs when deciding on a budget. Both areas can be critically important to a nation's economy. Times of war can have a substantial effect on a country's economy and its societal progression.
5 0
3 years ago
Its easy and due in like 10 minutes help pleaseee
Dmitriy789 [7]
Just write about Mexican culture from the movie
6 0
3 years ago
"[The] Constitution, which, by the undefined meaning of some parts, and the ambiguities of expression in others, is dangerously
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

It reflects the fear of many people as regards a centralized federal power.

Explanation:

The passage refers to the period that immediately followed American independence from Britain. The articles of this Constitution were ambiguous on purpose because, in that way, aristocrats in charge of the power could exercise rights and modify the Constitution at their convenience. Americans felt that a federal government that concentrated most of the authority over the states would establish a tyranny similar to the one King George III had.

4 0
3 years ago
Dry climates are found at what latitudes
maria [59]

Answer:

dry climates latitude is approximately between 18° to 28° in both hemispheres.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When did Andrew Johnson retired
ad-work [718]
Edit
The impeachment of Andrew Johnson was initiated on February 24, 1868, when the United States House of Representatives resolved to impeach Andrew Johnson, the 17th president of the United States, for "high crimes and misdemeanors," which were detailed in 11 articles of impeachment. The primary charge against Johnson was violation of the Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress in March 1867, over his veto. Specifically, he had removed from office Edwin M. Stanton, the secretary of war—whom the act was largely designed to protect—and attempted to replace him with Brevet Major General Lorenzo Thomas. (Earlier, while the Congress was not in session, Johnson had suspended Stanton and appointed General Ulysses S. Grant as secretary of war ad interim.)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Assess each of the statements below and determine which statement accurately describes the superior court.
    11·2 answers
  • Limited resources are all the options one must give up when making one choice over another.
    10·1 answer
  • Who paid for jacques cartier
    6·2 answers
  • In day of the butterfly the sixth-grade girls learn and admire myra true or false
    8·2 answers
  • Powers specifically granted to congress by the constitution are called enumerated powers. implied powers. inferred powers. obvio
    8·1 answer
  • How have electronic media and their convergence transformed journalism and news consumption?
    8·1 answer
  • Summarize your idea of what the northern states were like prior to the Civil War.
    11·2 answers
  • Because the mortgage conveys a complex claim for a long period of time, clauses are included in anticipation of possible future
    14·1 answer
  • The measured response of an experiment, the data collected is the ...
    15·2 answers
  • Which european nation conquered columbia, venezuela, and ecuador by the mid-1500s?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!