Answer:
"Analysis paralysis" is the appropriate approach.
Explanation:
- Analysis paralysis refers the condition where certain, mostly as a consequence or results of grossly oversimplifying evidence, observations, or overthinking a dilemma, a person or group of people would be unable to proceed through with a determination.
- It is the situation of well over-thinking becoming inability to conclude.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its B if not than D
Explanation:
In my opinion
The risk-as-feelings hypothesis suggests that people's judgments about risk are overly conscious (with not enough attention paid to automatic assessments.
This hypothesis includes emotions as an anticipatory factor, namely feelings at the moment of decision making and e<span>xplains a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in cognitive-consequentialist terms.</span>
Answer:
F = 8.45 * 10^-8 N
Explanation:
The gravitational force is calculated using
F = GMm/r²
Where
G represent gravitational constant = 6.67 * 10^(-11)
M = Mass of the boy = 78kg
m = Mass of the girl = 65kg
r = Distance between them = 2m
Substitute these values in the formula, we have:
F = (6.67 * 10^(-11) * 78 * 65)/2²
F = (6.67 * 78 * 65 * 10^(-11))/4
F = (33816.9 * 10^(-11))/(4)
[Divide by the denominator]
F = 8454.225 *10^(-11)
[Expand]
F = 8.454225 * 10³ * 10^(-11)
F = 8.454225 * 10^(3-11)
F = 8.454225 * 10^-8
[Approximate]
F = 8.45 * 10^-8 N
Hence, the force of attraction between them is 8.45 * 10^-8 N
