Answer:
C
Explanation:
I wouldn't start with A. She may be the spokesperson for those that don't like the Uniforms; her best course of action is present those views herself.
You don't want to give the powers that B any arguments at all. They may say "Well if you don't like Uniform A then choose 1 you do like and we'll endorse it." If she hates the idea of uniforms, she should never open the door to this option. Not B
Don't use question and answer until those who make the deciscion know what you are thinking. Not D.
You also don't want to make fun of the choice you may in the end be stuck with. Besides, you are making a kind of nasty comment about fellow students. Not E.
I think C is your answer. Be polite. Present your arguments. Remember the board holds the hammer and you do not. They have the power and you do not. They may not know exactly why you oppose uniforms, so treat your subject seriously.
Answer:
c. The expansion of the middle class in India as a result of globalization
Explanation:
Middle class is a socio-economic term which means "the social group between the upper and working classes."
Globalization has increased middle class in India as a result of increased jobs (especially in services sector) and businesses. So this dimension of globalization is regarded as social dimension.
Options a, b, and d are economic and commercial dimension of globalization.
Answer:
<em>"Come and show me another city with lifted head singing so proud..."</em>
Explanation:
"Chicago" (1914) is a poem written by Carl Sandburg (1878 – 1967), an American poet. It is about the U.S. city of Chicago.
The poem's fifth line calls Chicago "City of the Big Shoulders", which has been adopted as one Chicago's many nicknames.
Throughout the whole poem and these lines the poet has a very proud tone. When selecting from the provided lines, the pride is most clearly connoted by the use of words, <em>"Come and show me"</em> and <em>"lifted head singing so proud".</em>
Answer:
It uses a story to show how enthusiasm is important to achieving dreams (a)
Explanation:
I just did it on edgennuity
Answer:
An Ad Hominem fallacy is when someone personally attacks you to avert the audience from the real point.
Explanation:
<u>Example</u>: Person 1 - <em>"We should raise the minimum wage!"</em>
Person 2 - <em>"Oh please, don't listen to her, she's not even smart</em>
<em> enough to run a business!"</em>
Person 1 attacked Person 2 without even saying why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea. Ad Hominem is when someone insults another person instead of giving reasoning to why their opinion/statement is a bad idea. They try and steer you away from the point so that you agree with them. Maybe Person 1 isn't smart enough to run a business, but maybe she has a good idea in why they should raise the minimum wage.
