14 Amendment that “stopped” segregation and gave a African Americans rights
Abigail Adams thought the Virginia might not be passionate about liberty because it allows slavery. Therefore, the Option B is correct.
<h3>What is Abigail Adams letter?</h3>
In Abigail's "Letter to John Adams", she writes that <em>"I have sometimes been ready to think that the passion for liberty cannot be equally strong in the breasts of those who have been accustomed to deprive their fellow creatures of theirs." </em>The summary of this letter is that she think that those who practice slavery cannot sincerely value liberty for anyone, not even themselves.
Read more about Abigail Adams letter
brainly.com/question/25118965
#SPJ1
The correct answer is: Tanzania and Kenya.
Both bombings took place in 1998.
One of the bombings happened in Dar es Salam, in Tanzania, which was not the capital, as the capital was moved to Dodoma in 1996.
The other bombing happened in the capital of Kenya, in Nairobi
They both happened on 7. August and over 200 people were killed.
Answer:
When talking about the Vietnam War, it is necessary to make a distinction between the military results and the social impact of the conflict. Thus, in 1973, when the Vietnam War came to an end with an American defeat, things were going relatively well for the United States in the military field. In other words, several victories had been obtained in specific battles, although the guerrilla war continued to cause several headaches for the American soldiers. Therefore, the war was ended rather by antiwar social pressure that saw the conflict as a meaningless conflict in which America had no genuine interest and in which the lives of young Americans had no reason to be risked. Therefore, if it had not given in to social pressure, most likely America would have ended up winning the war.
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
