1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
3 years ago
7

Question 1 of 10

History
2 answers:
xxTIMURxx [149]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer is grandfather clauses.

Over [174]3 years ago
5 0
Separate voting boxes
You might be interested in
How did europeans change the nature of african slavery
Alex787 [66]
The Europeans increased the slave rate. after settling into the 13 colonies and earning the title 'colonists', the indentured servants(indentured servants are the poor people that signed a contract to pay for a trip to America, or if they were imprisioned) rebelled, and claimed that they were pushed into false promises of a new, better, life. The high class colonists decided that instead of free temporary help, they could pay once for a lifetime worth of slave labor. So, in conclusion, they increased slavery by a lot, creating a big ordeal.
6 0
3 years ago
Why would the Indigenous, Free Blacks, and Slaves want a revolution in 1800's Latin America?
UNO [17]

Answer:

Between the 1490s and the 1850s, Latin America, including the Spanish-speaking Caribbean and Brazil, imported the largest number of African slaves to the New World, generating the single-greatest concentration of black populations outside of the African continent. This pivotal moment in the transfer of African peoples was also a transformational time during which the interrelationships among blacks, Native Americans, and whites produced the essential cultural and demographic framework that would define the region for centuries. What distinguishes colonial Latin America from other places in the Western Hemisphere is the degree to which the black experience was defined not just by slavery but by freedom. In the late 18th century, over a million blacks and mulattos in the region were freedmen and women, exercising a tremendously wide variety of roles in their respective societies. Even within the framework of slavery, Latin America presents a special case. Particularly on the mainland, the forces of the market economy, the design of social hierarchies, the impact of Iberian legal codes, the influence of Catholicism, the demographic impact of Native Americans, and the presence of a substantial mixed-race population provided a context for slavery that would dictate a different course for black life than elsewhere. Thanks to the ways in which modern archives have been configured since the 19th century, and the nationalistic framework within which much research has been produced in the 20th and early 21st centuries, the vast literature examining Latin America’s black colonial past focuses upon geographic areas that correspond roughly to current national and regional borders. This is a partial distortion of the reality of the colonial world, where colonies were organized rather differently than what we see today. However, there are a number of valid reasons for adhering to a nationalist-centered framework in the organization of this bibliography, not the least of which is being able to provide crucial background material for exploring how black populations contributed to the development of certain nation-states, as well as for understanding how blacks may have benefited from, or been hurt by, the break between the colonial and nationalist regimes. Overall, the body of literature surveyed here speaks to several scholarly trends that have marked the 20th and early 21st centuries—the rise of the comparative slavery school, scholarship on black identity, queries into the nature of the African diaspora, assessments of the power wielded by marginalized populations, racial formation processes, creolization, and examinations of the sociocultural structures that governed colonial and early national life.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which company was a monopoly during the Gilded Age? Carnegie Steel Microsoft AT&T Allegheny Steel
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

The correct answer is Carnegie Steel

Carnegie Steel Company was founded Andrew Carnegie and a number of his close associates. It was a steel producing company that was as a result of a consolidation of a number of plants into one company leading to a monopoly

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the following items.
densk [106]
This is correct except switch 3 and 4 around. Hope this helps you!
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP I WILL MARK YOU BRAINEST
Elanso [62]
I do not know the answer but pls do not click the link the other person sent!! it is a scam
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • using the information on your timeline, do you think the catholic church would accept galileo's defense? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
  • What are some negative things about Andrew Jackson
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the use of coal an improvement on using human, animal, wood or water power for energy?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about religion and the two world wars is correct?
    9·1 answer
  • The siege of boston, which began in 1775, ended in 1776 when
    12·2 answers
  • What are the political and environmental impacts of global development?
    6·1 answer
  • What effect did chemical weapons, tanks, and submarines have on WW1?<br> (Written response)
    6·1 answer
  • Why does the poet use the word thanks in different languages? Cite
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a complete sentence?
    8·2 answers
  • Political
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!