Answer:
A. One-sample z-test for a mean
Explanation:
took the test and got a 98%
Answer: The forest growth in the understory was thick and dense; it was difficult to find the trail.
Explanation:
Technical writing involves the writing where the author or writer is describing a particular subject that needs direction, instruction or explanation, such writing style has different purpose and depending on the perspective used.
The forest growth in the understory was thick and dense; it was difficult to find the trail.
The writer tries to describe an event here, then uses metaphors to depict the picture.
An idiot would tell you that robots would take over the world. I honestly believe we as humans have the ability to make sure we don't go that far.
People, especially most Americans, have a borderline fetish for leisure. If it makes things easy, buy it, buy it, buy it now. Likely, more advancements will be made to make sure people won't have to leave their home via conventional ways to go to work. Basically, we get even more lazy than we already are, all things considered. Not to mention new innovations for war.
Some good can come from this, however. We require an alternative to fossil fuels, so green energy will be a must in the future. Advancements in medicine will thrive, after everyone discovers that there really are cures for almost anything (there's just no money for the doctors in curing the disease, only treating it). A cleaner Earth, a better planet, a better ecosystem.
Answer:
Check kiter.
Explanation:
What the exercise describes is a form of fraud commited with checks. The check kiter would take advantage of the float to make use of funds (that do not exist) in a bank account transforming a check in a form of unauthorized credit, like the exercise examplifies: Out of 2 accounts, you issue a check that overdraws their accout at bank 1, and then deposits a check in that account from their bank 2 to cover the first check. You "abuse" the float to make use of funds that don't exist.
The correct answer is B.
<u>Therefore the appropiate null and alternative hypothesis are the following:</u>
. H 0 : p 1 = p 2
H 1 : p 1 ≠ p 2
The aim of the test would be to conclude whether H0 should be rejected or not at a 10% significance level.
<u>In this case a billateral significance test needs to be conducted,</u> as such a test consists on testing the equality of the test value with a given value. In this case the H0 would be rejected if the test value is significanly different, both in the case that it is superior or inferior.
On the contrary, an unilateral significance test would have been conducted if aiming to check whether a value is superior or equal to the test value (left unilateral) or inferior or equal to this value (right unilateral).
Then, the result of the test is the one stated: rejecting H0 at the 10% significance level.
