Answer:
Caddo is an Indian nation in the southeastern United States (mainly, in western Oklahoma). The ancestors of Caddo were associated with the Plains Village culture – tribes who lived in the upper Missouri. In the last centuries of the pre-Columbian period, the southeastern United States was embraced by the Mississippian culture, which was based on previous archaic traditions. According to oral tradition, the Caddo tribe originated in northern Louisiana. Their culture developed in Arkansas and Louisiana and from there, it spread south and west. The Caddo tribe is related to the Wichita and Pawnee tribes, whose languages are also Caddoan.
The tribe was led by the hereditary leader (kahdi) and the council of elders (kanakha); also, there were female leaders. There were elected military leaders (amahoya). The people of tribe were engaged in agriculture (two sorts of corn, pumpkin, sunflower, beans, tobacco), gathering, hunting (deer, rabbit, waterfowl, bear, bison), and fishing.
Explanation:
Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
B). Strongly linked. The only real difference is the much more developed social welfare system in Canada, which slightly alters the way tax revenues are collected and processed.
Answer: Width = 6 meters
Length = 10 meters
Explanation:
Here's the complete question:
A room has an area of 60 square meters and a perimeter of 32 meters. What are the length and width of the room?
Area = Length × Width
Perimeter = 2(Length + Width)
Therefore,
L × W = 60 ....... i
2L + 2W = 32 ....... ii
From equation ii,
2L + 2W = 32
Divide through by 2
L + W = 16
L = 16 - W ........ iii
Put the value of L into equation i
L × W = 60
(16 - W) × W = 60
16W - W² = 60
W² - 16W + 60 = 0
W² - 10W - 6W + 60 = 0
W(W - 10) - 6(W - 10) = 0
(W - 6)(W - 10) = 0
Therefore,
W - 6 = 0
W = 0 + 6
W = 6
Width = 6 meters
Since Length = Area / Width
Length = 60/6
Length = 10 meters
the filioque controversy and the role of the pope
