The answer is: When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, both the expertise of the source and the quality of the arguments equally influenced their attitudes.
This happen because the student's argument is extremely influenced by whether they could be involved in the comprehensive exam.
If the exam would be implemented in the following year, the students are very likely to face the exam themselves. This make them much more likely to have negative attitudes toward the idea.
If the exam would be implemented in the next 10 years, the students wouldn't have to face it. Therefore, their attitude would be less negative toward the comprehensive exam.
Chinja
Malaysia: Creating laws, teaching people, re establishing forest
North Korea: Company taking control to help
Philippines:Company taking control to help
Answer:
I believe the answer is Maine but im not 100%
Answer:
Justice
Explanation:
According to Beauchamp, market justice emphasizes individual responsibility, minimal obligation to the common good, and the fundamental freedom to all individuals to be left alone.
<span>Business people in intense competition with each other to produce a better, less expensive product or service are and always has been good for the economy of any country. When businesses are allowed to become too big to fail, to hire trained gunslingers in the form of expensive lobbyists and contribute heavily to the campaigns of candidates who provide those businesses favors, privileges, subsidies, tax cuts, etc., they cease to be good for the economy of our country. </span>
<span>
Business owners hate unions because it gets in the way of them making money.
</span> Unions are hated because they force business owners to do the right thing. Sometimes what is right keeps them from maximizing their profits. There are labor laws, however can be ignored when greed is involved. Most employers get away with it as opposed to employers who have employees with unions.
