1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frez [133]
3 years ago
12

Why might irene emerson have rejected dred scotts offer to purchase his family and their freedom

History
1 answer:
notka56 [123]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

ONIONS

Explanation:

In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott innocently made his mark with an "X," signing his petition in a pro forma freedom suit, initiated under Missouri law, to sue for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. Desiring freedom, his case instead became the lightning rod for sectional bitterness and hostility that was only resolved by war.

image of Dred Scott

Dred Scott

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

"Dred Scott, a man of color, respectfully states. he is claimed as a slave."

(Petition to Sue for Freedom, 6 April 1846)

Initially, Scott's case for freedom was routine and relatively insignificant, like hundreds of others that passed through the St. Louis Circuit Court. The cases were allowed because a Missouri statute stated that any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom. The petition that Dred Scott signed indicated the reasons he felt he was entitled to freedom. Scott's owner, Dr. John Emerson, was a United States Army surgeon who traveled to various military posts in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin Territory. Dred Scott traveled with him and, therefore, resided in areas where slavery was outlawed. Because of Missouri's long-standing "once free, always free" judicial standard in determining freedom suits, slaves who were taken to such areas were freed-even if they returned to the slave state of Missouri. Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach.

Dred Scott was born to slave parents in Virginia sometime around the turn of the nineteenth century. His parents may have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a later date. The mystery of exact ownership is one that would follow Dred Scott, and later his family, throughout their lives as slaves. With few records extant, it is difficult to identify exactly when ownership of the family was transferred to various parties. By 1830, Peter Blow had settled his family of four sons and three daughters and his six slaves in St. Louis. This was after having moved from Virginia to Alabama, to attempt farming near Huntsville, and, when that failed, a move from Alabama to Missouri. In St. Louis, Peter Blow undertook the running of a boarding house, the Jefferson Hotel. Within a year, though, his wife Elizabeth died and on June 23, 1832, Peter Blow passed away.

image of front view of St. Louis

Front view of St. Louis

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

The Blow children remained in St. Louis after the deaths of their parents and became well established in the city's society through marriage to prominent families. Charlotte Taylor Blow married Joseph Charless, Jr., in November 1831; his father had established the first newspaper west of the Mississippi River and had been a leading opponent of slavery while editor. Charless, Jr., operated a wholesale drug and paint store, Charless & Company (later Charless, Blow, & Company when brothers-in-law Henry Taylor Blow and Taylor Blow became partners). Martha Ella Blow married attorney Charles Drake in 1835. Drake is better known in history for his role in the creation of Missouri's 1865 constitution. As a leader of the Radical Republican Party after the Civil War, he was determined to punish those considered Southern sympathizers; the constitution he helped author took away many of their rights, including enfranchisement. Peter Ethelrod Blow married Eugenie LaBeaume in 1833. She was from an old French banking family; her oldest brother was a wealthy businessman who, in partnership with Blow, formed Peter E. Blow & Company. She had two other brothers; one was the St. Louis County sheriff for a time in the 1840s, and one, Charles Edmund LaBeaume, was a St. Louis attorney who played an important role in Dred Scott's freedom suits. All of these St. Louis connections proved helpful to Dred Scott.

<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
You might be interested in
Which African American rights activist advocated an accommodating, patient approach to equality?
olga_2 [115]
The correct answer among all the other choices is Booker T. Washington. The African American rights activist who advocated an accommodating, patient approach to equality is Booker T. Washington. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does the U.S. Senate vote on appointments to the president's cabinet?
Irina18 [472]
.............The answer is B
7 0
3 years ago
What prior knowledge can you apply to this passage? People can change—but they don’t always like it Humans are amazing in how ad
Romashka [77]

Answer:

Through effective electronic communication students can establish new friendships and tackle difficult problems from the viewpoint of students from different cultures. Pupils and staff gain first-hand knowledge of other education systems, customs and the reality of life in a country different from their own.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What is one effect of the size of South African rivers?
bogdanovich [222]

The correct answer is A. Exploration was limited because there were no rivers on which to travel Into the Interior.

Explanation:

In the excerpt, the author explains in the map of South Africa there are long rivers; however, these rivers are dried or completely dried most of the time, this is explained in "you find either a waterless bed or a mere line of green and perhaps unsavory pools."

Moreover, this feature of rivers makes them useless in regards to transportation, which caused the interior area of the country to be unexplored for a long time. This is explained in "People could not penetrate it by following waterways". Also due to this, explorations occurred by land but this limited the exploration. According to this, one effect of rivers was "Exploration was limited because there were no rivers on which to travel Into the Interior."

3 0
3 years ago
What two candidates faced off in the presidential election of 2000? A. Al Gore &amp; George W. Bush B. John Kerry &amp; Al Gore
KIM [24]
The answer is Geogre W. Bush and Al Gore
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 32
    15·1 answer
  • When the revolutionary war ended, america owned all of the land east of the mississippi river except for florida, which was prev
    11·1 answer
  • Based on the Supremacy Clause, what must a judge support in the event of a legal conflict? state law over federal law city law o
    6·1 answer
  • “Senate Rejects Supreme Court Nominee”
    6·1 answer
  • What did England need before challenging rival nations in their quest for foreign territories?
    11·2 answers
  • Question 2
    6·1 answer
  • What part of the Constitution starts with the words "We the People"?
    5·2 answers
  • in 1795 there was a population of 4 million. today there are 320 million people . about how many times as many people live in US
    8·1 answer
  • What are the first 10 amendments that were added to the Constitution? a. Report on Public Credit b. Bill of Rights Judiciary Act
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these is a modern day result of the spanish colonization of the Americas ​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!