1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frez [133]
3 years ago
12

Why might irene emerson have rejected dred scotts offer to purchase his family and their freedom

History
1 answer:
notka56 [123]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

ONIONS

Explanation:

In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott innocently made his mark with an "X," signing his petition in a pro forma freedom suit, initiated under Missouri law, to sue for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. Desiring freedom, his case instead became the lightning rod for sectional bitterness and hostility that was only resolved by war.

image of Dred Scott

Dred Scott

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

"Dred Scott, a man of color, respectfully states. he is claimed as a slave."

(Petition to Sue for Freedom, 6 April 1846)

Initially, Scott's case for freedom was routine and relatively insignificant, like hundreds of others that passed through the St. Louis Circuit Court. The cases were allowed because a Missouri statute stated that any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom. The petition that Dred Scott signed indicated the reasons he felt he was entitled to freedom. Scott's owner, Dr. John Emerson, was a United States Army surgeon who traveled to various military posts in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin Territory. Dred Scott traveled with him and, therefore, resided in areas where slavery was outlawed. Because of Missouri's long-standing "once free, always free" judicial standard in determining freedom suits, slaves who were taken to such areas were freed-even if they returned to the slave state of Missouri. Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach.

Dred Scott was born to slave parents in Virginia sometime around the turn of the nineteenth century. His parents may have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a later date. The mystery of exact ownership is one that would follow Dred Scott, and later his family, throughout their lives as slaves. With few records extant, it is difficult to identify exactly when ownership of the family was transferred to various parties. By 1830, Peter Blow had settled his family of four sons and three daughters and his six slaves in St. Louis. This was after having moved from Virginia to Alabama, to attempt farming near Huntsville, and, when that failed, a move from Alabama to Missouri. In St. Louis, Peter Blow undertook the running of a boarding house, the Jefferson Hotel. Within a year, though, his wife Elizabeth died and on June 23, 1832, Peter Blow passed away.

image of front view of St. Louis

Front view of St. Louis

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

The Blow children remained in St. Louis after the deaths of their parents and became well established in the city's society through marriage to prominent families. Charlotte Taylor Blow married Joseph Charless, Jr., in November 1831; his father had established the first newspaper west of the Mississippi River and had been a leading opponent of slavery while editor. Charless, Jr., operated a wholesale drug and paint store, Charless & Company (later Charless, Blow, & Company when brothers-in-law Henry Taylor Blow and Taylor Blow became partners). Martha Ella Blow married attorney Charles Drake in 1835. Drake is better known in history for his role in the creation of Missouri's 1865 constitution. As a leader of the Radical Republican Party after the Civil War, he was determined to punish those considered Southern sympathizers; the constitution he helped author took away many of their rights, including enfranchisement. Peter Ethelrod Blow married Eugenie LaBeaume in 1833. She was from an old French banking family; her oldest brother was a wealthy businessman who, in partnership with Blow, formed Peter E. Blow & Company. She had two other brothers; one was the St. Louis County sheriff for a time in the 1840s, and one, Charles Edmund LaBeaume, was a St. Louis attorney who played an important role in Dred Scott's freedom suits. All of these St. Louis connections proved helpful to Dred Scott.

<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
You might be interested in
What reception did James Monroe recurve when he toured the country
mojhsa [17]

When President Monroe toured the country for the first time at the beginning of his presidency (in the summer of 1817), in order to assess existing fortifications in the Northern States, but also to get in contact with an ample representation of Americans - no other President before him met as many people as he did - he was warmly received. He had a very affable and likeable personality, and everywhere he went, from Maine to Boston, and from Detroit to Washington D.C., he received a fond and enthusiastic reception. It was, in fact, during Monroe's visit to New England, that a journalist coined the expression "Era of Good Feelings," a phrase that has come to represent the years that spanned Monroe's presidency.      

7 0
2 years ago
Why do we know more about the survival stories of Western European Jews than we do Eastern European Jews?
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

For half a century, memories of the Holocaust limited anti-Semitism on the Continent. That period has ended—the recent fatal attacks in Paris and Copenhagen

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A group of people with common practices, activities, and interests make up a _____. partnership hunter-gatherer band society civ
Viktor [21]
Working together strategy
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does federalism mean under the US Constitution?
Tatiana [17]

Answer :

<u><em>A. division of powers between state and national governments </em></u>

B. election of representatives by the people of the nation  

C. division of the legislature into two houses  

D. separation of government into three branches

Explanation :

Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between a national government and various state governments. In the United States, the U.S. Constitution gives certain powers to the federal government, other powers to the state governments, and yet other powers to both

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the complaints against the king of england listed in the declaration?
stepan [7]
Complaint #3
I find that the first selfish thing the British did was in the early 1760's, when they imposed taxes on the colonists without their consent. The colonists then ordered no taxation without representation. I chose this as my first complaint because the colonists had to use their own money to pay for the British governments debt for The French and Indian war.
Complaint #2

In my opinion the third most important complaint was "He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures." This means that when the war was in a time of peace the colonists inferred that the British troops were going back to Britain. They didn't though, lots of troops stayed in America. In fact most stayed at the colonists' houses for free.
Complaint #4
The lowest ranked out of the 5 complaints to me was when the British cut off trade with all parts of the world. England only allowed the colonies to trade with them. They clearly did not want to trade with just the British. Therefore they had to improvised by making their own clothes, tools, growing their own food etc. There was a bright side of this complaint though. The colonies became reliant on each other, which brought them closer together.
By Mariah Dokken
Complaint #5
Another unjustified thing the British did was depriving them in many cases, of the benefit of trial by juries. For example during the sugar act colonists smuggled goods that had taxes on them (so that they didn't have to pay). Well the British obviously didn't like that. So instead of colonists having their own trial the British just arrested them. They didn't give the people a chance to prove if they were innocent or not.
Complaint #1
<span>The fourth complaint to me is, "He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people." For example in 1768, the Representative Assembly of Massachusetts sent a letter to the King and his parliament. It was about making the law disappear about the British restricting America. I put this as the fourth one because the individual rights of the people are necessary in a free and democratic society. Without them America wouldn't be what it is today.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a challenge that Western nations faced regarding disarmament?
    13·2 answers
  • Which concept is illustrated by the fact that congress has the power to introduce and pass laws and the president has the respon
    8·1 answer
  • What pamphlet convinced many that the American colonies needed to make a formal break with Great Britain?
    12·1 answer
  • True or false. Look at pic plz.
    9·2 answers
  • Lincoln's Address
    15·2 answers
  • Do you think the words and phrases that are used in the media influence the perceptions
    10·1 answer
  • What is a push factor?
    15·2 answers
  • Who was the first Haitian presidents.
    8·1 answer
  • Sa paanong paraan ng paraan nagkakapantaypantay ang tao​
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the Three-Fifths Compromise at the
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!