1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frez [133]
3 years ago
12

Why might irene emerson have rejected dred scotts offer to purchase his family and their freedom

History
1 answer:
notka56 [123]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

ONIONS

Explanation:

In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott innocently made his mark with an "X," signing his petition in a pro forma freedom suit, initiated under Missouri law, to sue for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. Desiring freedom, his case instead became the lightning rod for sectional bitterness and hostility that was only resolved by war.

image of Dred Scott

Dred Scott

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

"Dred Scott, a man of color, respectfully states. he is claimed as a slave."

(Petition to Sue for Freedom, 6 April 1846)

Initially, Scott's case for freedom was routine and relatively insignificant, like hundreds of others that passed through the St. Louis Circuit Court. The cases were allowed because a Missouri statute stated that any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom. The petition that Dred Scott signed indicated the reasons he felt he was entitled to freedom. Scott's owner, Dr. John Emerson, was a United States Army surgeon who traveled to various military posts in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin Territory. Dred Scott traveled with him and, therefore, resided in areas where slavery was outlawed. Because of Missouri's long-standing "once free, always free" judicial standard in determining freedom suits, slaves who were taken to such areas were freed-even if they returned to the slave state of Missouri. Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach.

Dred Scott was born to slave parents in Virginia sometime around the turn of the nineteenth century. His parents may have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a later date. The mystery of exact ownership is one that would follow Dred Scott, and later his family, throughout their lives as slaves. With few records extant, it is difficult to identify exactly when ownership of the family was transferred to various parties. By 1830, Peter Blow had settled his family of four sons and three daughters and his six slaves in St. Louis. This was after having moved from Virginia to Alabama, to attempt farming near Huntsville, and, when that failed, a move from Alabama to Missouri. In St. Louis, Peter Blow undertook the running of a boarding house, the Jefferson Hotel. Within a year, though, his wife Elizabeth died and on June 23, 1832, Peter Blow passed away.

image of front view of St. Louis

Front view of St. Louis

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

The Blow children remained in St. Louis after the deaths of their parents and became well established in the city's society through marriage to prominent families. Charlotte Taylor Blow married Joseph Charless, Jr., in November 1831; his father had established the first newspaper west of the Mississippi River and had been a leading opponent of slavery while editor. Charless, Jr., operated a wholesale drug and paint store, Charless & Company (later Charless, Blow, & Company when brothers-in-law Henry Taylor Blow and Taylor Blow became partners). Martha Ella Blow married attorney Charles Drake in 1835. Drake is better known in history for his role in the creation of Missouri's 1865 constitution. As a leader of the Radical Republican Party after the Civil War, he was determined to punish those considered Southern sympathizers; the constitution he helped author took away many of their rights, including enfranchisement. Peter Ethelrod Blow married Eugenie LaBeaume in 1833. She was from an old French banking family; her oldest brother was a wealthy businessman who, in partnership with Blow, formed Peter E. Blow & Company. She had two other brothers; one was the St. Louis County sheriff for a time in the 1840s, and one, Charles Edmund LaBeaume, was a St. Louis attorney who played an important role in Dred Scott's freedom suits. All of these St. Louis connections proved helpful to Dred Scott.

<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
You might be interested in
What challenges did American cities face in the late 1950s and early 1960s unravel?
olga2289 [7]

Answer:Read this,hope it helps!

The 1950s in America are often described as a time of complacency. By contrast, the 1960s and 1970s were a time of significant change. New nations emerged around the world, and insurgent movements sought to overthrow existing governments. Established countries grew to become economic powerhouses that rivaled the United States, and economic relationships came to predominate in a world that increasingly recognized that the military may not be the only means of growth and expansion.

6 0
3 years ago
How did franklin roosevelt's presidency change the u.s. government
allsm [11]

Answer:

He made presidency de center of American politics.

Explanation:

He's kwon as the first moderns President. During his period, Congress gain more power, and Presidency as well.

All this happen through his decisive decisions, owning his authority. His philosophy was 'President has the right to use any and all power'.

Also, during his mandate, he develop responsibility to the people. He also believed that government has the right to regulate big businesses, this decisions had people consent, because he wanted to raise the economy participating in the Big Industries of the Country.

8 0
3 years ago
When did the liberation of western europe begin?
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

June 1944 to August 1944

Explanation:

During World War II (1939-1945), the Battle of Normandy, which lasted from June 1944 to August 1944, resulted in the Allied liberation of Western Europe from Nazi Germany's control

6 0
3 years ago
What ways did Stalin cut off Berlin in the Berlin Blockade?
Musya8 [376]
On 24 June, the Soviets severed land and water connections between the non-Soviet zones and Berlin. That same day, they halted all rail and barge traffic in and out of Berlin. The West answered by introducing a counter-blockade, stopping all rail traffic into East Germany from the British and US zones.
3 0
3 years ago
Describe why the Incan Empire became harder to manage as it grew
DaniilM [7]

Some of the peoples it conquered didn't want to be ruled by the Incas and were rebellious, mainly, and it was so big that it couldn't keep the conquered in line very well.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which one of the following best illustrates a position of neutrality? the signing of Jay's Treaty the U.S. did not take any side
    8·2 answers
  • What does Emperor Hirohito’s statement during his surrender speech reveal about the impact of nuclear weapons?
    13·1 answer
  • How might Islamic scholars have used Galen’s treatise to further innovations in medicine?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of economic reconstruction
    5·2 answers
  • Why is transportation difficult on Africa’s rivers
    5·2 answers
  • How does the author relate the text at the top of the poem on page 193 to the poem by Du Fu?
    14·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINIEST PLEASE HELP!!
    5·1 answer
  • Match each term with the phrase that best defines it.
    8·1 answer
  • The Treaty of Paris ended the French and Indian War.
    7·1 answer
  • America declared war on Spain after
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!