Answer:
C
Explanation:
Job 1
Annual Income+ Benefits- (annual housing & utility cost)
78,000+4,000-( 1,350*12)= 65,800
Job 2
Annual Income+ Benefits- (annual housing & utility cost)
100,000+2,500-( 3,150*12)= 64,700
Therefore, job 1 is a better choice
The answer is flighting advertising schedule. It is a publicizing progression or timing design in which promoting messages are booked to keep running amid interims of time that are isolated by periods in which no publicizing messages show up for the promoted thing.
Answer:
Walker's did not outperform because it PE Ratio is close to Industry average. Industry's data is based on average which means some of the firms may have very high PE ratio and some might have quite lower than the average. It is not obvious that the Walker's outperformed or under-performed. Complete data about the individual firms might make us able to compare the performance of Walker's. Apparently its performance is up to the mark as its PE ratio is very close to Industry average.
Explanation:
<u>PE Ratio</u> is a term which show the investors confidence on the firm. It shows that how much price investors are willing to pay against each unit of earning.
Answer:
$5,472
Explanation:
Calculation for Alison record of purchase :
First step
Invoice price ×Percentage of payment term
Where:
Invoice price =$5,700
Percentage of payment term =96%
(100%-4%)
Second step
$5,700×96%
=$5,472
Therefore Alison should record the purchase at: $5,472
