Well fossils are the closest thing we can see that explains the past and if you get a species that lived million years ago and now as well you can try and compare what changed and make a hypothesis on why those changes happened and most scientists can see what the past looked like due to the millions of studies that have happened to see if the creature lived on land or in the sea.
(A) autonomy . . recognized
(B) impunity . . committed
(C) succession . . observed
(D) nepotism . . commended
<span>(E) discrimination . . criticized</span>
Answer:
Act 2 scene 1
Explanation:
https://www.sparknotes.com/nofear/shakespeare/hamlet/page_82/
Answer:
Many people feel that Krakauer was rather sympathetic if not outright biased towards Chris. In his writing some people find is a certain heroic slant to Chris's story. I think the novel becomes more readable not because of bias but rather that Krakauer understands MCandless. He sees in Chris similar motivations and attitudes as he had as a young man. This gives the book a depth of meaning because Krakauer is a great writer and Chris somehow inhabits parts of Krakauer's belief system. I think Krakauer is critical of Chris when it comes to Chris's treatment of his family. I think, however, that there are the sensibilities of a kindred spirit going on here that gives us a unique access into Chris's world.
