Answer:
<u><em>please mark brainliest!</em></u>
Explanation:
C. suggests new products for development
Answer: INJUNCTION.
Explanation: An injunction can be defined as a statement issued by a court of equity or a court of law that prohibits a party from certain acts according to the demands of the statement.
Courts issues injunctions in labor disputes if the company can show just cause such as the possibility of violence or the destruction of property.
Answer:
The correct answer is: True.
Explanation:
<u>Moral imperatives can be understood as strong principles that lead a person through life to act in ways he/she considers morally right. </u>
<u>Moral imperatives are not utilitarian; this means that the person does not act in favor of the consequences that will result from acting in a particular way, but rather because acting in such a way, it's the right thing to do.</u>
<u>The concept of moral imperative was described by Immanuel Kant, and they were part of the broader concept of categorical imperatives.</u>
In conclusion, to the statement: <u>A moral imperative</u> prescribes an action, not for the sake of some result, but simply because that action is our moral duty, the correct answer is: True.
<span>Actually in this scenario, Angela mainly experiences a great social platforms outside the school, where she could meet and chat with different types of peoples with different natures and behaviours with full freedom, and also she can share some of her feelings with others, there by she can feel busy socially in between many peoples, so there by she has found this effective options for dealing all her stress.</span>
The fact that the appearance of an irrelevant distractor, while an individual is recalling a word list, is evidence of the interference theory of forgetting.
This theory states that forgetting is caused by the appearance of competing memories. There is 2 categories. Retroactive interference occurs when new information interferes with the retrieval of old information and proactive interference occurs when old information interferes with the retrieval of new information.
In this example, this is a case of retroactive interference because an irrelevant distractor (new information) appears while the individual is recalling items on a word list (old information).
