An argument can be made for both decades as having a greater impact on the development of US society. Viewing both decades in comparison to US society in 2017, it could be said that the 1920s was more impactful, in the sense that the US in 2017 looks a lot more like 1927 than 1937.
In the 1920s, the country was a war-weary nation that was in the process of turning inward, figuring out its identity following a costly war which didn't directly affect Americans. The result was the election of a questionably qualified Republican president who said that a return to normalcy, to the America of old, was what the nation needed. He pursued heavier tariffs and policies that would withdraw America from the world stage.
The nation was enjoying a soaring stock market setting all time records on a near daily basis. There was a great deal of inequality, and in the absence of a cohesive national vision/identity, people turned to false idols of status, partying, and conspicuous opulence to find meaning and fulfillment. Many illegal drugs, such as marijuana and alcohol at the time, were consumed openly and in large quantities despite their illegality.
Everything written above could be said of the United States in 2017. Let's hope that the parallels do not continue into the 9th year of the decade, when an epic stock market crash led to over a decade of economic disaster in the United States.
Your your your your mom also bro get a life do some ether please also help your moths out
Answer:
Once locked in war, Vietnam and the United States have built mature ties rooted in mutual ... Four decades after the end of the Vietnam War, the relationship between the United States and Vietnam has changed remarkably.
Explanation:
The correct answer here is the public opinion.
All of the methods mentioned here are ways the politicians may test and see the public opinion. Polls are maybe the main indicator of the public opinion next to voting results but at stage it is a bit late for the candidate. Direct contact with the population is also a method by which the politicians can learn what troubles the said population.