1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeu [11.5K]
3 years ago
9

Let A be a finite, non-empty subset of R. Prove that A has a maximum and a minimum. (Recall that a maximum of a set A is an uppe

r bound for the set that belongs to A, and a minimum of a set is a lower bound for the set that belongs to the set.) Hint: This result may seem so obvious that it isn't clear h One way is to use induction on the number of elements of the set.
Mathematics
1 answer:
julia-pushkina [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Let us use mathematical induction to prove the statement. So, we are going to start checking the statement for the first natural numbers.

n=1: Our set is \{x_1\}. So, obviously, x_1 is the maximum and minimum of our set. Then, the statement is true for n=1.

n=2: Our set is \{x_1,x_2\}. Necessarily, x_1 or x_1>x_2. In both cases, there is a minimum and a maximum.

Once we have our statement checked for the initial cases, we state our <em>induction hypothesis</em>:

For every finite set A of n elements there exists a maximum and a minimum.

Now, let us prove the that the above assertion is true for sets with n+1 elements.

Our set is A=\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n,x_{n+1}\} and we want to find

\max\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n,x_{n+1}\}.

Notice that this problem is equivalent to solve

\max\{\max\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\},x_{n+1}\},

i.e, to find the maximum among n+1 numbers, we can find first the miximum among n and then compare with the other one.

Now, using our induction hypothesis we know that there is a maximum in the set \{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\}, because it has n elements. Let us write

x' =\max\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\}.

So, in order to find the maximum of A, we have to find the maximum of \A'={x',x_{n+1}\}. As we have checked at the beginning, there is a maximum in A', and it is the maximum of A.

Hence, we have completed the prove for the existence of the maximum of a set with n+1 elements. The prove for the existence of the minimum is analogue, we just need to change ‘‘maximum’’ for ‘‘minimum’’.

You might be interested in
(Urgent!!) Find the value of x
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

x =  squre root of 405

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
there are 4 coins. you get a dollar for every head. all four coins are flipped. what is the outcome? what about if you can choos
weqwewe [10]

The outcome for the flip is 2.

Probability:

Probability refer the possibility of the event required.

The probability formula is defined as the possibility of an event to happen is equal to the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes and the total number of outcomes.

Given,

There are 4 coins.

You get a dollar for every head. all four coins are flipped.

To find the outcome of the flips.

The possible outcomes from the initial flip are:

"4 heads" x 1

"3 heads" x 4

"2 heads" x 6

"1 heads" x 4

"0 heads" x 1

This gives an expected return of

=> (4 + 12 + 12 + 4 + 0)/16 = 2

So, the outcome is 2.

Either if you keep it then you have 2 as outcome of the flips, otherwise if you reflip the coins then you will get the same probability for it also.

To know more about Probability here.

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
Hold 0.45 ounce. how many more ounces does a bottle of nail polish hold?
Tamiku [17]
0.8-0.45=0.35
The bottle of nail polish can hold 0.35 more ounces
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jaime makes the following claim.
Sphinxa [80]

Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.

<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>

Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.

So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.

The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.

So Jaime is clearly incorrect.

If you want to learn more about angles:

brainly.com/question/17972372

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Write 0.21 repeted as a fraction in simplest form.<br> 0.21
Jlenok [28]

Answer:

Below is the answer in the simplest form possible: 0. 21 repeating as a fraction = 7/33 Decimal Repeating as a Fraction Calculator

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how you can find 4times 754 using two different methods
    12·1 answer
  • What is the common ratio of this one?
    11·1 answer
  • suppose the population of a town is 8,600 and is growing 3% each year. Predict the population after 3 years
    15·1 answer
  • Whats 16/40 as a mixed fraction?
    11·1 answer
  • Can somebody help me with this question
    13·1 answer
  • Please can someone help my assignment in math.​
    5·1 answer
  • How do i simplify the rational function: (x^2-4)/(x+2) if x ≠ -2?
    7·1 answer
  • F(t) 2t-3<br> F(7)=?<br> What does f(7) equal?
    9·2 answers
  • The length of a rectangle is four times its width.
    12·1 answer
  • Mr Chopra wants to put a wooden border around a painting. If the length of the painting is 40 cm and its breadth is 25 cm, what
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!