Answer:
True (Dead-weight loss )
Explanation:
When the market is not allowed to adjust towards the equilibrium the economics efficiency is lost. When the supply is excessive compared to demand some part of supply remains intact, which means that small of amount of supply does not contribute to economics and allocation efficiency and considered as a dead-weight loss. The supply is forgone because the market is not allowed to stabilise.
Answer:
Sell the parts without any processing because the profit is higher ($20,000 vs $15,000)
Explanation:
they have two options:
- option A, sell the parts as they are and make $20,000 in profits (= $120,000 - $100,000).
- option B, further process the parts by spending $75,000 and sell them for $190,000, and make only $15,000 in profits (= $190,000 - $100,000 - $75,000).
The best option is A, to sell the parts without any processing because the profit is higher and they do not have to spend more money.
The answers are the following:
a.
Brandon:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×3¿= $8,500
Ryan:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×1¿= $7,500
b.
Brandon $7,000
Ryan <span>$7,000</span>
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
a) J. Crew is issuing its catalogs monthly in response to inflation. This will incur cost and it is known as 'Menu Cost'.
b) Grandpa has bought annuity which has promised $10,000 a year for the rest of his life. However, higher than expected inflation means grandpa has lesser purchasing power. This is loss of purchasing power and also 'redistribution cost'. In higher inflation borrower tends to get benefit. Here insurance company is at the gain.
c) Maria is witnessing loss of purchasing power because of hyper inflation. In such scenario, cost keeps rising and product's price could be higher a few hours later. This was witnessed in Germany as well as in Zimbabwe. People run to the stores as soon as they get cash or salary. It is known as 'shoe leather cost'. People make frequent trips to banks or stores but do not keep cash in fear of losing value.
d) Gita actually earned only 5% on her portfolio but as her income is in taxable bracket so she has to pay 20% tax. Her income from portfolio not even compensated inflation. This is a redistribution cost and also known as fiscal drag. More people fall into bracket because higher nominal income but real income is neglected which makes people worse off.
e) Father thinks that son is earning far more than him but inflation over the period of time erodes purchasing power and it could be possible that current income might be lower, same or higher comparing to inflation data. However, if it is lower then it is obviously loss of purchasing power.
I tink its C. now 100% sure
hoped i helped plz make me the brainliest thx