1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-Dominant- [34]
3 years ago
6

How did the process of creating and ratifying the Constitution, and the language of the Constitution itself, confirm the positio

ns of African Americans, women, and Indians in the new republic? How did these roles compare to the stated goals of the republic?
History
1 answer:
Stella [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer  is that the process of ratifying the Constitution on the positions of African Americas, women and natives as equal memebers of society with the same right as white males.

Explanation:

This roles compare to the stated goals of the republic to be the land of opportunity for everyone and that America is the land of the free and equality.

You might be interested in
The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case declared which of the following was unconstitutional?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did the two groups fight in the american revolution
vaieri [72.5K]
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, trouble was brewing in America. Parliament (England's Congress) had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists did not like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war
Most Americans disagreed. They believed that England had fought the expensive war mostly to strengthen its empire and increase its wealth, not to benefit its American subjects. Also, Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.
4 0
3 years ago
What happened during King Philip’s War?
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

In colonial New England, King Philip's War begins when a band of Wampanoag warriors raid the border settlement of Swansea, Massachusetts, and massacre the English colonists there. ... In early 1676, the Narragansett were defeated and their chief killed, while the Wampanoag and their other allies were gradually subdued.

Explanation:

in the answer

6 0
2 years ago
Bible question.
Llana [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

The second temple was destroyed during a Jew uprising against the Roman Empire. The priests were massacred and many Jews banned to live inside Jerusalem. The Romans built a pagan temple at the original site.

The Christ's second coming is a key event that all Christians await as He will deliver the final judgement to all humans.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the consequence of brooks's beating of sumner in the north? The south?
viva [34]

This event is known as the Caning of Charles Sumner, and it took place on May 22, 1856. On this date, Representative Preston Brooks, who was a supporter of slavery, attacked Senator Charles Sumner, who was an abolitionist. He used a cane to do so, leading to the name of the event.

The issue shocked people due to its violence, and it led to the development of even more division between the North and the South. In the North, Brooks was seen as a savage, and Sumner as a martyr. People were enraged, and they believed the episode was an example of the lack of tolerance displayed in the South. On the other hand, the event was supported by many in the South, as they believed it demonstrated the weakness of the Northerners.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a feature of Athenian democracy during the 5th century
    9·1 answer
  • Would you live here?
    15·1 answer
  • The Qin Dynasty was responsible for?
    6·1 answer
  • What caused the famine in the 1600s? New technologies failed to produce enough crops. A terrible disease caused the death of man
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following European diseases was often the most lethal to Native Americans? A. pleurisy B. typhus C. smallpox D. mea
    5·2 answers
  • Please help for 10 points
    7·1 answer
  • Which statements describe causes of the Spanish-American War in 1898?
    8·1 answer
  • In what ways did European empires in the Americas resemble their Russia, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman counterparts, and in what
    12·1 answer
  • What was the benefit of Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) limiting the production of crops and livestock?
    9·1 answer
  • The president oversees American foreign policy. Which of the following does he appoint?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!