Based on the information given above, statement 2 is true and accurate since it is consistent with the two factor theory of emotion. The two factor theory of emotions states that emotion is grounded on two factors and these are the physiological arousal and cognitive label. This means that when an emotion is sensed, a physiological arousal happens and the person uses the close environment to look for emotional signals to tag the physiological arousal.
We have that the social , physical ,and emotional well being of those exposed to risky teenage behavior is affected by
Low self esteem
It's important to note that a risky teenage behavior refers to the illegal and Socially unacceptable behaviors found among teenagers of variant ages.
- Social :In the social sense of things risky teenage behaviors that affect negatively on others and cause a low self esteem and conserved behaviors to those affected and not able to speak out
- Physical:Irrational risky teenage behavior may often lead to violence and resolve to the hurting of others.
- Emotional: Metal health is affected when risky teenage behavior are exhibited in the society, And this may leave its victim Emotional deprived
For more information on this visit
brainly.com/question/21811998
Audio induction is the assistive device which she might find most useful in her having difficulties in hearing during the video call.
<h3>What is Audio induction?</h3>
This is referred to as an assistive listening technology which are used by individuals who have difficulties in hearing.
It is also referred to as hearing loop and comprises of cables which are placed in the area so as to amplify the sound and ensure it is well heard by the affected individuals.
Read more about Audio Induction here brainly.com/question/18374351
#SPJ1
Answer:
Identity vs. role confusion is the 5th stage of Erik Erikson's theory of psychological development. It begins at 12-18, years of adolescence. During this stage, the adolescence find themselves searching for who they are through their values, goals, and beliefs. They will look into their morales, and continue from there. This leads them into preparing for older life.
Substantive disagreement may never be resolved because it leads to clashes of opinions.
A disagreement or argument is said to be substantial if it centers on the presentation of divergent viewpoints regarding the truth or the adherence to opposing ideals.
There must be a means to distinguish substantive disagreement (SD) from conceptual disagreement if legal concepts can be the subject of SD. Arguments that persons debating a certain philosophical problem are only having a linguistic argument are one approach to reject the substantiveness of the issue. For instance, it has been argued that the seeming conflict over the mind/brain identity thesis is only a word one and that there is no real controversy over whether or not mental traits are the same as neurological ones.
To know more about Substantive disagreement refer to:
brainly.com/question/28085499
#SPJ1
