Answer:
the bystander effect.
Explanation:
According to the bystander effect one is less likely to help a person when there number of people in the vicinity is high.
The reasons why this happens is due to three factors, diffusion of responsibility, ambiguity and behaving according to social norms.
- Diffusion of responsibility
When there are a lot of people around one might think that someone else will take the responsibility of taking action. This may happen as one might think that someone else might be better suited to handle the situation
If the situation is not clearly understood by the bystander then they will be less likely to help.
One might think if they would help it would be going against the social norms and hence hesitate to do so.
Here, Mr. Hughes has decided not to help because of the diffusion of responsibility.
Hence, his reaction illustrates the bystander effect.
Studies have suggested that texting or using a cell phone while driving is as dangerous as:- <u>"driving under the influence of </u><u>alcohol</u><u> or drugs."</u>
<u />
Drivers talking by cell phone drove significantly worse than drivers talking to passengers. The cell phone users have been much more likely to drift off their lane, kept a greater distance between their vehicle and the car in front, and were 4 times more likely to miss pulling off the highway at the rest area.
The usage of your cellular phone even as riding is not only risky but also illegal. In California, you cannot use a mobile cellphone or similar digital communication tool while holding it in your hand. You can only use it in a hands-loose manner, such as speakerphone or voice commands, but never while holding it.
learn more about cell phones here brainly.com/question/1476828
#SPJ4
<u />
Answer:
There are many pros and cons to this concept.
The pros are that we have better materials for protection and offense for our military. Also, this gives individuals better defense, as well.
The cons to this concept is that people in the wrong state of mind can easily injure or worse kill vulnerable people.
So what does this say about the United States in general?
The United States is like a pan balance; if there aren’t many weapons, there will be fewer massacres, shootings and robberies. But, say someone in a situation where that does happen, there is a higher and unfortunate chance that they won’t be able to protect themselves. If there are lots of weapons, there will be more crime, but also an increase in defense & protection and a decrease in vulnerability.
The United States is full of extremely intelligent people which can have dangerous consequences. An increase in weapons technology is another step up in nature and it shows America’s power, brilliance, and intelligence. This will make the U.S. military undefeatable.
Answer:
I dont get the question well is that how it really is on the test
Explanation:
