Answer:
(of figures) identical in form; coinciding exactly when superimposed.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I know that there is a zero and a 1 involved in this somewhere. The only answer I can get which is a bit of a cheat, is
1^0! = 0!^1
These are not exactly the same thing. The trouble is that they are equal. There is a difference between "not the same thing" and "equal."
If I think of something else, I'll put it in a comment.
Answer:
4x- 16
Step-by-step explanation:
Heineken v River vs ievrroe wfej ghe
Sum/difference:
Let
This means that
Now, assume that 
is rational. The sum/difference of two rational numbers is still rational (so 5-x is rational), and the division by 3 doesn't change this. So, you have that the square root of 8 equals a rational number, which is false. The mistake must have been supposing that was rational, which proves that the sum/difference of the two given terms was irrational
Multiplication/division:
The logic is actually the same: if we multiply the two terms we get
if again we assume x to be rational, we have
But if x is rational, so is -x/15, and again we come to a contradiction: we have the square root of 8 on one side, which is irrational, and -x/15 on the other, which is rational. So, again, x must have been irrational. You can prove the same claim for the division in a totally similar fashion.
Answer:
N= -14
Step-by-step explanation:
first you add 16 to both sides, then -30 + -16 = -14
