1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ki77a [65]
3 years ago
5

Austin Bradford Hill (1897-1991), a British medical statistician, described a criteria as a way of determining the causal link b

etween a specific factor (e.g., cigarette smoking) and a disease (such as emphysema or lung cancer). What is it called?
History
1 answer:
monitta3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Criteria of Causation

Explanation:

Hills Causation Criteria outlines the minimum requirements required to construct a causal relationship between two components. These conditions were initially proposed by a British medical statistician named Austin Bradford Hill (1897-1991),  as a way of identifying the causal link between a particular attribute (e.g. cigarette smoking) and a disease ( e.g. lung cancer). Although it is quite easy to say that agent for example smoking causes disease such as lung cancer, but on the other hand it is quite contrary to create a clear, statistically relevant relationship between the two cases.

You might be interested in
Berlin had a free section (or sector) even though it was deep in Communist territory.
lawyer [7]
Yes, it is true that <span>Berlin had a free section (or sector) even though it was deep in Communist territory, since this section was "West Berlin" which was operated mainly by the Americans and British. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
During the Constitutional Convention, the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise gave Congress the power to choose its own members
Ronch [10]

Answer:

This Compromise regulated commerce in the North and South but not the slave trade. That was put off for another 20 years.

Explanation:

The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was one of the agreements reached in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. There were two issues at stake here. First, Southern states did not want the new federal government to have the power to regulate commerce. They were afraid that this would give the government the power to effectively end slavery in the United States. The second issue was the slave trade itself. Northern states wanted to abolish the international slave trade, while southern states did not.

These were contentious issues. Most northern states had already begun abolishing slavery at the state level, as they moved towards more industrial economies. The southern states, which were the richest in the country at the time, relied heavily on slave labor. It was so important to them that Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina threatened to leave the convention.

So, a compromise was struck. To appease the Southern states, it was agreed that the federal government would not have the authority to tax the export of goods from any state, and that it would not attempt to ban the international slave trade for 20 years (although it could tax imported slaves like any other product). In exchange, the slave-holding delegates of the South agreed to remain in the convention. The Constitution was finalized, but the divisive issue of slavery was built into the fabric of the country, unresolved.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One day Nelson Mandela decides not to go for his morning run. What happened to make him not feel
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer:

his body asked mandela about his family which made hime very upset

Explanation:

hope this helped i think its right

4 0
2 years ago
Which statements about immigrants in the late 1800s are true?
Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

A. Many immigrants had no skills and were forced to take low-paying jobs.

C. Many immigrants were looking for political freedom that had been denied them at home.

Explanation:

New research by Stanford economist Ran Abramitzky studies Norwegian immigrants to the U.S. during the late 19th and early 20th centuries who chose to return to Europe. Return migrants hailed from poorer backgrounds but ended up holding higher-paid occupations back home.

In the late 1800s, people in many parts of the world decided to leave their homes and immigrate to the United States. Fleeing crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, many came to the U. S. because it was perceived as the land of economic opportunity. Others came seeking personal freedom or relief from political and religious persecution, and nearly 12 million immigrants arrived in the United States between 1870 and 1900

8 0
3 years ago
Plz, Help!!! How did American Indians choose sides in wars fought between Europeans? 1. They chose the side that offered them a
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:2

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • El gobierno de ollanta humala establece programas sociales asistenciales desde el Ministerio de
    12·2 answers
  • Where did women first gain economic opportunty
    15·1 answer
  • Which answer choice does not contain any punctuation errors? A. "It's a sunny day. Let's go for a picnic, she said. I'll make lu
    8·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, the american farmers in the west were helped by each of the following EXCEPT the
    10·1 answer
  • How has systemic racism in your institution affected people of color
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a way that a king could strengthen royal power?
    15·1 answer
  • Significance of the great strike of 1877?
    7·1 answer
  • What was one of the problems faced by the united states after ww2?
    12·1 answer
  • Americans believed that the Monroe Doctrine encouraged them to follow what policy
    13·1 answer
  • Why was Hammurabi a more effective ruler for their city-state
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!