1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
13

What were the consequences of the treaty of Versailles for Germany

History
2 answers:
Sophie [7]3 years ago
7 0

The most severe punishment one group of countries has placed upon another.

France especially levied heavy reparations on Germany. This resulted in the ruining of the German economy, causing starvation and raising social and political unrest.

It is interesting that France actually started WW1. Austria Hungary was totally within it's rights as a sovereign Nation to act upon the uprising in Serbia. Deciding to declare war brought the world close to it's knees.

It's not surprising that the terms of the treaty of Versailles brought rise to National Socialism and Hitler through a populous movement.

In final analysis, the Treaty of Versailles was in essence a treaty designed to start WW2.

goldenfox [79]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The consequences of the treaty of Versailles for Germany is discussed below.

Explanation:

  • Major of the usual provocative titles of the treaty was the battle Guilt Clause, which explicitly and straight criticized Germany for the eruption of hatred.
  • The treaty limited Germany to disarm, to make provincial grants, and to repay settlements to the Allied powers in the tremendous number of $6 billion.

You might be interested in
Which phrase best describes Charles Town?
Ivan
The answer is c the
3 0
3 years ago
What is an open-ended question?
Eva8 [605]
Letter C is the correct answer:D
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the Lords demanding of the Crown? ( English Bill of Rights 1689)
butalik [34]

Answer:

It was to set out certain basic civil rights and clarifies who would be next to inherit the crown

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What if Lincoln would allowed South Carolina to take fort summer in 1861
finlep [7]

Answer:

04/12/2011

On this date, a century and a half ago, Confederate forces fired on Fort Sumter, on an island off the coast of South Carolina. The Confederate States of America asserted not only their right to secede but also to claim federal property within their borders. The newly inaugurated U.S. president, Abraham Lincoln, rejected both claims and refused to evacuate Sumter.

“Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy,” Lincoln had said in his somber inaugural address a month earlier. “A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.”

The Civil War, to Lincoln, was never technically a “war” but an illegal and unconstitutional rebellion and a fight to put down the rebellion. The details of the events leading to the firing on Fort Sumter have much to do with this attitude and with his total rejection of the possibility of secession.

By attempting to resupply Sumter, Lincoln succeeded in forcing the Confederacy to fire the first shots. Lincoln had to accept the loss of Sumter soon after. But he was successful, so to speak, in forcing the other side to start the shooting. Lincoln believed that justified the military actions that he subsequently ordered to put down the rebellion.

5 0
3 years ago
What branch can impeach and remove president from office?
Aloiza [94]
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the sole court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is limited to removal from office but also provides a means by which a removed officer may be disqualified from holding future office.
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these indicated that the Tang Dynasty had lost the Mandate of Heaven?
    8·2 answers
  • Connecting the past to the present helps you know how people have?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP ME PLEASE!!!! I NEED HELP!!!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Give an example of how present Jewish culture is strongly connected to its past.
    7·1 answer
  • How did one child challenge the whole world
    14·1 answer
  • This is a free trade agreement
    14·1 answer
  • What was controversial about the election of 2000
    10·1 answer
  • What is the single most important factor that led to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan.
    14·1 answer
  • How did the beating of senator sumner pull the nation apart
    15·1 answer
  • The Sagebrush Rebellion took place against the policies of the federal government during the Carter administration. What evidenc
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!