Scientists today are studying tidal power as an alternative energy source for generating electricity. Some scientists conclude t
hat tidal power is a good alternative source of energy because it uses a natural process, does not rely on fossil fuels, and does not release greenhouse gases. These scientists recommend building tidal power plants around the United States in locations with high tidal power potential. Other scientists conclude that tidal power is not a good alternative energy source because tidal power plants can negatively impact the surrounding ecosystem by killing marine animals, restricting fish migration, reducing the natural flow of water, and causing silt buildup in waterways. These scientists recommend not building tidal power plants in U.S. waterways. Both conclusions are based on valid data and scientific reasoning. How can both conclusions be valid?
<em>Both conclusions can be valid because they are based on valid data and scientific reasoning.</em>
In order for a data to be valid in making a conclusion, such data must have been collected through a scientific experiment that is devoid of subjectivism. In order words, the data must have been objectively collected via standard experimental procedures.
Once data have been collected, they are analyzed and used to make valid conclusions based on the hypothesis which must have been made earlier before the experiment.
Conclusions made from standard experimental procedures and scientific reasonings are valid and such experiments are reproducible.
<em>Hence, as long as the data from which the conclusions were made can be reproduced through the same experiments, the conclusions are valid.</em>
Taigas have few native plants besides conifers. The soil of the taiga has few nutrients. It can also freeze, making it difficult for many plants to take root. The larch is one of the only deciduous trees able to survive in the freezing northern taiga.
