1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Assoli18 [71]
3 years ago
13

describe how mass industrialization allowed European states to achieve control over much of the globe in the late 19th and early

20th centuries
History
1 answer:
laiz [17]3 years ago
3 0

This should help you!:)Developments in 19th-century Europe are bounded by two great events. The French Revolution broke out in 1789, and its effects reverberated throughout much of Europe for many decades. World War I began in 1914. Its inception resulted from many trends in European society, culture, and diplomacy during the late 19th century. In between these boundaries—the one opening a new set of trends, the other bringing long-standing tensions to a head—much of modern Europe was defined.

Europe during this 125-year span was both united and deeply divided. A number of basic cultural trends, including new literary styles and the spread of science, ran through the entire continent. European states were increasingly locked in diplomatic interaction, culminating in continentwide alliance systems after 1871. At the same time, this was a century of growing nationalism, in which individual states jealously protected their identities and indeed established more rigorous border controls than ever before. Finally, the European continent was to an extent divided between two zones of differential development. Changes such as the Industrial Revolution and political liberalization spread first and fastest in western Europe—Britain, France, the Low Countries, Scandinavia, and, to an extent, Germany and Italy. Eastern and southern Europe, more rural at the outset of the period, changed more slowly and in somewhat different ways.

Europe witnessed important common patterns and increasing interconnections, but these developments must be assessed in terms of nation-state divisions and, even more, of larger regional differences. Some trends, including the ongoing impact of the French Revolution, ran through virtually the entire 19th century. Other characteristics, however, had a shorter life span.

Some historians prefer to divide 19th-century history into relatively small chunks. Thus, 1789–1815 is defined by the French Revolution and Napoleon; 1815–48 forms a period of reaction and adjustment; 1848–71 is dominated by a new round of revolution and the unifications of the German and Italian nations; and 1871–1914, an age of imperialism, is shaped by new kinds of political debate and the pressures that culminated in war. Overriding these important markers, however, a simpler division can also be useful. Between 1789 and 1849 Europe dealt with the forces of political revolution and the first impact of the Industrial Revolution. Between 1849 and 1914 a fuller industrial society emerged, including new forms of states and of diplomatic and military alignments. The mid-19th century, in either formulation, looms as a particularly important point of transition within the extended 19th century.

<span>The Industrial Revolution</span> Britannica Stories <span><span> <span> In The News / Health & Medicine Pollution Responsible for One in Four Deaths of Small Children </span> </span><span> <span> Demystified / Science Is Climate Change Real? </span> </span><span> <span> Spotlight / History The Legacy of Order 9066 and Japanese American Internment </span> </span><span> <span> In The News / Health & Medicine Sickle Cell Disease Reversed with Gene Therapy </span> </span></span> Economic effects

Undergirding the development of modern Europe between the 1780s and 1849 was an unprecedented economic transformation that embraced the first stages of the great Industrial Revolution and a still more general expansion of commercial activity. Articulate Europeans were initially more impressed by the screaming political news generated by the French Revolution and ensuing Napoleonic Wars, but in retrospect the economic upheaval, which related in any event to political and diplomatic trends, has proved more fundamental.

Major economic change was spurred by western Europe’s tremendous population growth during the late 18th century, extending well into the 19th century itself. Between 1750 and 1800, the populations of major countries increased between 50 and 100 percent, chiefly as a result of the use of new food crops (such as the potato) and a temporary decline in epidemic disease. Population growth of this magnitude compelled change. Peasant and artisanal children found their paths to inheritance blocked by sheer numbers and thus had to seek new forms of paying labour. Families of businessmen and landlords also had to innovate to take care of unexpectedly large surviving broods. These pressures occurred in a society already attuned to market transactions, possessed of an active merchant class, and blessed with considerable capital and access to overseas markets as a result of existing dominance in world trade.


You might be interested in
Persuading the states to accept the Constitution was every bit as difficult as the founding fathers had predicted. How long did
Aleks [24]
I believe 2 years but im not 100% sure, the other ones just dont make sense

hope this helped!
6 0
3 years ago
The Indus Valley is situated between what two Nations
Licemer1 [7]
I think its Pakistan and India might be wrong sorry
<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Click here to read and refer to "Mary Pickersgill, Flagmaker" by Johnathan T. Barnes in order to answer the question below. Remo
Furkat [3]

Answer: Bias by omission.

  • <em>Bias by omission</em> refers to the exclusion of relevant information. In this case, removing mention of the British would be a bias of omission.
  • <em>Bias by source choice</em> happens when an author only looks at a certain type of source, especially when this type is likely to confirm the opinion of the author.
  • <em>Unintentional bias</em> occurs when the author's personal beliefs or ideology are unconsciously introduced in the text.
  • <em>Bias by arrangement</em> happens when a story is purposely designed to be more accessible to readers, therefore minimizing the impact of other stories. This happens when the media covers only one type of stories.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What groups were important In the south during reconstruction? Explain how each group influenced reconstruction.
natima [27]
What groups were important In the south during reconstruction?

The Radical Republicans and the Southern Democrats were very important in the south during reconstruction. 


Here are some of their views that influenced Reconstruction: 

One thing to keep in mind is that the main issue relating to Reconstruction that divided Republicans at the end of the Civil War was how the Confederates should be dealt with/punished. Radical Republicans wanted to enslave the South until further notice and grant the Confederates with a brutal punishment because they blamed them for the lives lost in the war. They also advocated expansion of rights for the freedmen. However, some of their petitions were too “radical” to be made lawful and were, for a time, vetoed. So, they achieved some of their goals, but President Johnson prevented them from making some foolish mistakes. 

Southern Democrats wanted to limit the rights of the freedmen. Nevertheless, the radical republicans rained on their parade for the radicals were the majority in the house and senate. So,  the 14th amendment outlawed Black Codes and put an end to the loophole the Confederates had made to an end.


While it seems that Radical Republican's played the main part of Reconstruction, the efforts of the Southern Democrats should not be underestimated. Their endeavors to shun equality hindered the Reconstruction for several years; because of their undertakings, it took society a while to accept former slaves as brothers and sisters. 
3 0
4 years ago
Explain how the sharam trade helped the economy of Mali synic​
Anettt [7]
Just look it up and keep working jk beceuse is your answer
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the Constitution's system of checks and balances designed to do?
    11·2 answers
  • List in order the people\ who ruled mesopotamia
    7·1 answer
  • Could Cortes have defeated the Aztecs if they had not been weakened by disease?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Congressional Reconstruction end in 1877
    6·1 answer
  • How were the roles of athens and sparta alike and different?
    7·1 answer
  • NO LINKS OR ELSE YOU'LL BE REPORTED! Only answer if you're very good at History.
    5·2 answers
  • 4.
    15·1 answer
  • &gt; Question 4 Which nation invaded East Timor after it became independent? (4 points) Portugal O United States O Indonesia O S
    11·1 answer
  • What is one achievement of the Ming dynasty?
    10·2 answers
  • Please make these events in order 50 Points worth it.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!