I'll attempt to answer this one! Agriculture gave people the chance to grow crops of all kinds depending on their materials or resources. Agriculture was pretty easy for anyone to learn and maintain for themselves. Agriculture led to an abundance because seeds were easy to acquire from the crops to grow more and many people were able to grow their own crops. In terms of pastoralism, people could also raise livestock. They could derive meat from the animals and food sources such as milk from animals like cows or goats. The livestock were pretty easy to maintain as many of them only needed to eat grass to produce/grow well.
Personal Freedom can only be guaranteed in a rule where the person can decide who rules.
Explanation:
In communism the state has the highest power, over the people.
That means that the state can decide when to restrict the movement of the people or to take away their personal freedom from them if the state deigns it so.
In democracy that is not possible.
The personal freedom of movement and of expression are some of the inalienable rights of a true democracy.
No matter what happens these are the rights that are enshrined to a democracy safeguarded by the elections.
Answer: Useful in the afterlife
Explanation:
Food related artifacts were important items to bury with someone as having food in the afterlife was used in the afterlife and was varied depending on social status.
<u>Answer:</u>
The party activists impose a so-called litmus test on potential Supreme Court nominees to determine whether they are politically inclined towards the party's ideology or not.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The litmus test in politics is simply to determine whether the candidate supported by the party complies with the party's ideology or not.
- It is to make sure that once the candidate is appointed to the post of authority, would he or would he not prove beneficial for the fulfillment of the issues on the party's agenda.
On Brainly, it's good to separate into smaller questions than to post a multi-part question. I'll reply to just a couple of your line items, based on Wilson's "Fourteen Points" which he outlined in a speech before Congress on January 8, 1918. Those principles guided his aims when participating in the peace conference at Versailles.
What should happen to colonies of the defeated nations? They should be allowed to govern themselves. That would be in line with Wilson's point 5 -- which stated that at the very least "the <span>interests of the populations concerned must have equal weight with" the claims of any colonial powers. You could also choose "League of Nations oversight" so long as it is assumed that the goal of that oversight is to give the people of the region ability to self-determine their government desire going forward.
</span>
What should happen to German armed forces? I'd choose "be reduced to prewar levels" - or less than that, without specifying a number. In general, Wilson wanted ALL nations to pursue a reduction of armed forces. Point 4 of his 14 points desired "a<span>dequate guarantees given and taken that national armaments will be reduced to the lowest point consistent with domestic safety." Wilson did not want Germany to be treated harshly, fearing that would only stoke the coals for resentment and more war. In the end, the Versailles agreement went in the harsh direction. The "no conscription, 100,000 men" answer in the table you showed is what the treaty actually put in place, as well as banning Germany from having an air force.
</span>
That's two of your topics. I'll let you work on the others.
