Rivers supplied not only water for the colonist, but transportation which also led to trade. Also a lot of wild life are around river which gave them food also weather it be fish in the rivers or animals that come to the river to drink. So rivers provided water, transportation, and food.
General Lee assumed that the Union is totally composed of cavalry only. He commenced an attack to advance through the Union forces. However the Union was backed by two corps of infantry. This is the reason why General Lee surrendered.
In contrast, expert testimony is admissible only if the witness "qualifies as an expert by virtue of knowledge, skill, experience, education or training" and the testimony provided meets four requirements: increase. Knowledge helps those who know the facts to understand them.
The subject matter of the testimony must be related to the issue at issue. - The usefulness of the testimony outweighs the ill effects it can have.
In the common law system, an expert opinion is usually provided by one of the parties. Evidence must be credible, relevant to the case, conclusive rather than conclusive, and permissible for fact-checking. A fact-finder determines how much weight is given to testimony.
Learn more about testimony at
brainly.com/question/4214423
#SPJ4
Answer:
o the effects of the drought
Explanation:
The most serious problem affecting agriculture in Washington in the 1920s and 1930s is the drought condition because drought condition decrease the productivity of the crop. Water is the main material needed by the plants to absorb nutrients and transportation of materials inside the plant body so decrease occurs in the productivity of crops due to unavailability of water for the crops is the most serious problem for agriculture in Washington.
A parent argues that violation of a free appropriate public education often starts with the evaluative process because, with free education, students might begin to take schools and colleges for granted.
<h3>Disadvantages of Free Public Education</h3>
- Schools wouldn't exert as much effort to conserve funds and adhere to a budget if college was free. These schools would engage in wasteful expenditure practices as they are aware that they will always receive financing.
- Additionally, since education is free for everybody, private colleges would no longer need to compete for students.
- Students might not take school as seriously if it is free. Because their education is being given to them for free, they won't value it.
- When tuition is paid out of their own pockets, students are more likely to put more effort into their studies.
- In the US, the state is frequently responsible for paying for public education. The money would have to come from other crucial programs that many low-income families rely on if a state's budget didn't have enough money to finance free college.
To learn more about free public education refer to:
brainly.com/question/23566306
#SPJ4
