Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
Answer
slash and burn farming removed unwanted wildlife from an area
According to Jeffrey's article, the classical school and positivist school have different approaches to what constitutes criminal behavior. Apply scientific techniques to the investigation of crime.
What does the scientific method entail when investigating crimes?
The scientific method has five key steps: presenting the issue, developing a hypothesis, gathering evidence through observations and experiments, interpreting those results, and drawing conclusions.
How can the scientific method be used to solve crimes?
To precisely reenact and establish the sequence of events leading up to a crime, forensic experts employ a variety of procedures. The scientific method is used to carefully collect tangible evidence, which is then utilized in court to establish someone's guilt or innocence.
To know more about scientific techniques to the investigation of crime.
brainly.com/question/14471449
#SPJ4
