1. Assuming that the underlined words are 'Carl Sandburg,' the correct answer is A. simple subject. Although you may be led to believe this is a complete subject (because it consists of more than one word), in fact, it is not. Carl Sandburg is the name and the surname of one person, which is why it is considered to be a simple, rather than a complete subject.
2. Assuming that the underlined words are '<span>served as a soldier during the Spanish-American War,' the correct answer is D. complete predicate. As you can see, these words include the simple verb served, as well as all other words which modify, or describe that verb. This is why this is complete, rather than a simple predicate. Simple predicate would be only the word served.
3. Assuming that the underlined words are 'would influence,' the correct answer is B. simple predicate. Similarly to the first sentence, you may be led to believe this is complete because there are more than one word in the phrase. However, the verb phrase would influence is considered to be one entity given that it is only a particular tense of that verb. Even if it said 'had been influencing' instead of 'would influence,' it would still be a simple predicate.</span>
The Third option is correct.
^-^ you get a gold star
Answer: it is known as the mere exposure effect. So (b)
Explanation:
Causr he said. That however, we are also more likely to be in regular close proximity to people with whom we see regularly, we unknowingly form some sort of relationship with them, or tge geographical region.
Answer:
we are yet not free from corruption..
Answer:
1. They use ethos by using a specific era, the gun isnt as advanced someone would now use. The people arent wearing what everyone would wear.
2.Pathos is shown but in a subtle way, how the hunter with the gun, their eye bulges out and also the other hunter that is dragging the bear, is just doing what the other person is saying.
