Americans hated President Hoover. They believed that he was the source of all of their misfortune. To top off their hatred, Hoover refused to get the government involved in kickstarting the economy.
It makes them more independent. If they had a limitless amount of terms, they could just vote for whatever was suitable at that time and keep their political power. Since they won't be able to stay in the congress longer, then they can vote whatever they want because there's nothing that will affect whether or not they get elected again.
England was nations new world empire that provided them with economic supremacy
Answer: D. England
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
War is not only about the military but also about the resources.
Explanation:
War is not just about fighting on the battlefield. It requires some economic investment, so this is one of the more essential factors. The Union initially chose an offensive strategy that entailed attacks on the Confederacy's three territories backed by economic pressures. The Union also had a strong navy, so blocking the coast for the opposing side was a powerful blow to their economy. This strategy entailed a slow economic weakening of the opponents, which was ultimately crucial in the war.
The Confederacy was in an awkward position; they wanted to retain the right to secession. Their efforts to invade the North are a very thankless situation. The developed North, with infrastructure, could quickly move an army from one place to another. In that case, the Confederation had to agree to the fact that the North decides the time and place of the battle, which is an advantage at the outset. The Confederacy deployed troops along the borders, which contributed to the dispersal of the army. It acted offensively when the opportunity arose for such a manoeuvre. One example of offensive action is the attempt to conquer Colorado mines, which failed.
Such a constellation of relations contributed to the North's commitment to war. Developed industry, infrastructure, and economic blockade of the south are crucial factors in the victory of the North over the south.
No.
The Treaty of Versailles (1919) was a peace treaty signed by the European powers that officially ended World War I.
After six months of negotiations in Paris, the treaty was signed as a continuation of the November 1918 armistice in Compiègne, which had put an end to the clashes. The main point of the treaty required Germany to accept all responsibility for causing the war and, under the terms of articles 231-247, to make reparations to a number of nations of the Triple Entente.
Although the Versailles treatment was a good one, it was a way of blaming Germany and punishing it, but I don't think it's possible to say that there was peace when years later the World War II happened. They should have proposed an agreement between all countries and not just as a way of holding Germany alone.
