The primary distinction between the two is that Confucius places a greater emphasis on the value of developing one's knowledge in addition to loving and respecting one's fellow humans.
While Lao Tau places a strong emphasis on the value of cultivating inner peace and achieving a sense of equilibrium in one's life,
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Confucius?</h3>
Generally, Confucius was a Chinese philosopher and statesman who lived during the Spring and Autumn era. He is widely regarded as the most illustrious of all Chinese wise men and women. The teachings and philosophy of Confucius continue to have a significant impact on culture and society in East Asia, especially in China and other parts of East Asia.
In conclusion, Confucius stresses the value of loving and respecting people together with increasing knowledge, which is the major distinction between the two.
Lao Tau, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of achieving balance in your life and inner tranquility.
Read more about Confucius
brainly.com/question/10163227
#SPJ1
<em>In the modern era, the equivalent practice of using the presidency as a bully pulpit (Theodore Roosevelt) could best be summed up in the phrase,</em> "going public". President Theodore Roosevelt took an unrestricted view of his job. In two administrations, he never hesitated to take his case - controversies - <u>directly to the people</u> (a Presidency called “bully pulpit”). He was the typical proactive President of the 19th century.
Bully pulpit is the ability to use the Presidency´s office to influence Congress to accept legislative proposals. An active use of the Presidency’s prestige to inspire/moralize.
Answer:
The answer is Backstage Behavior.
Explanation:
How we act back stage is liberated from the desires and standards that shape our conduct when we are front stage. Being at home rather than out in broad daylight, or at work or school, is the clearest boundary of the contrast among front and back stage in social life. Given this, we are regularly more loose and agreeable when back stage, we let our protect down, and we may be what we consider our uninhibited or "genuine" selves. We push off components of our appearance required for a front stage execution, such as swapping work garments for easygoing garments and lounge-wear and perhaps change the manner in which we talk and comport our bodies.
As new constitutions were ratified, the rights were amended.
I don't think so probably not but maybe.. just maybe :l
