Sue's total pay of year will have three parts
1) Fixed Salary for 12 months
one month salary = £1410
so 12 month salary = £1410 x 12 = £16920
2) 26% of total profit
Total cost to the company- £473,500
Total income for the company - £549,000
Profit = Total income for the company - Total cost to the company
= £549,000 - £473,500 = £75500
Sues income from profit = 26% of £75500 = (26 × 75500)/100 = £19630
3) Bonus if Sue sells at least 16 cars
Given number of months when sue solds atleast 16 cars = 4
So bonus income = 4 × 390 = £1560
Adding the three above parts
Sue's total pay for the year = £16920 + £19630 + £1560 = £38110
The number is -30
Exp
2/3=-20
1/3=-10
3/3=-30
As ray UW bisects ( divides the angles into two equal parts )
WUT = WUV
6x - 10° = 4x + 6°
6x - 4x = 6° + 10°
2x = 16°
x = 16° ÷ 2 = 8°
Putting the value of x in the Angle WUT
6 × 8° - 10° = 48° - 10° = 38°
Answer:
We accept the alternate hypothesis and conclude that mean SAT score for Stevens High graduates is not the same as the national average.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = 510
Sample mean, 
= 502
Sample size, n = 60
Sample standard deviation, s = 30
Alpha, α = 0.05
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
We use Two-tailed t test to perform this hypothesis.
Formula:
Putting all the values, we have
Now,
Since,
We reject the null hypothesis and fail to accept it.
We accept the alternate hypothesis and conclude that mean SAT score for Stevens High graduates is not the same as the national average.
