<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same region that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the encroachment of Europeans forced many native tribes that had up until this point been rivals to form alliances in order to stop the spread of European settlement. </span></span>
The consequences of atomic bombings of Japan are far-reaching and have mostly long-term effects. The first option offered is a long-term effect, since it takes at least a few years or decades for the occurrence of mental illness in future generations. A sudden increase in and development of leukemia can occur in the short term, especially due to radiation, but overall the consequences are seen as long-term, as their appearance and development does not stop soon after the bombing, on the contrary, continues through generations. Increased ability for future generations to have birth defects is also a long-term consequence, as it relates to future generations, does not end in a few years.
The only short-term consequence is the inability to undergo X rays, because of the amount of radiation that already exists in the human body.
To combine Titian's color with Michelangelo's drawing.
This depends on ideals and opinions but from my point of view it is not a fair and democratic way of selecting the president due to the fact that the citizens of this country have no real say in who is president. Therefore it is not democratic. Fair? No because the electoral college Can have biases just like any other human and they are not the majority. This goes hand in hand with the democracy question. If I was to be democratic. The citizens should cancel out what the electoral college says.
Now I’m the side of the reasoning as to why the electoral college exists. It’s understandable. Everyone is not trustable enough to decide the fate of the country. Overall it is not fair and democratic.
Answer:
D. revolt and seize their property
Explanation:
