The soviet union is an extremely dangerous and sketchy country.
There is, however, another side to the question. The English stage was most flourishing in the time of Queen Elizabeth. The dramatists of that day looked upon amusement as only a part of their duties. Many men of lofty and penetrating intellect used the theatre as a medium for the expression of their thoughts and ideas.
Their aim was to ennoble and elevate the audience, and imbue it with their own philosophy, by presenting noble characters working out their destiny amid trials and temptations, and their pictures, being essentially true to nature, acted as powerful incentives to the cultivation of morality.
Shakespeare stands preeminent among them all, because by his wealth of inspiring thought he gives food for reflection to the wisest, and yet charms all by his wit and humour and exhibits for ridicule follies and absurdities of men.
It is a great testimony to the universality of his genius that, even in translations, he appeals to many thousands of those who frequent Indian theatres, and who differ so much in thought, customs and religion from the audiences for which he wrote.
Answer:
Roman Republic, Representative Democracy.
Explanation:
The Athenian Democracy closely followed that of a direct democracy, in which each male citizen was given a voice in politics and was able to directly shape their civilization.
The Roman Republic, on the other hand, followed a representative democracy to a certain degree. In this case, there is a senate, created by members appointed by consuls. This was a indirect indirect representative democracy, in which technically they do the same job as our indirect democracy, but in this case, the people are not given the chance to actually vote for their representatives. However, it is still a form of indirect democracy, and lines up with the United State's current system of government much more better than direct democracy. However, that is not too say that direct democracy is not used in the United States, it is just not used frequently.
~
<span>While the Pilgrims were Separatists, the Puritans were non-separating Congregationalists they believed the Church of England was the one true church and they were loyal to England, but not in the way they worshiped. They believed that "New England" </span>
20weeks nothing after that
