Answer:
Cost of goods manufactured = Cost of goods sold + Ending finished goods inventory - Beginning finished goods inventory
Cost of goods manufactured = $22,000 + $46,000 - $10,000
Cost of goods manufactured = $58,000
Explanation: In order to obtain cost of goods manufactured, we need to add cost of goods sold to ending finished goods inventory and deduct beginning finished goods inventory. Ending work-in-process inventory should be ignored because it has been considered before arriving at cost of goods manufactured.
Answer:
The answer is a sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost is irrelevant in present decision making. It is the cost that had already been incurred. It is irreversible.
Here, $500 spent on fixing the transmission does not matter again.
Opportunity cost is wrong because it means the alternative that has been forgone i.e alternative not chosen. For example, if you have an opportunity to either buy milk or bread and you went for bread, the opportunity cost is the cost of milk you didnt buy.
Incremental cost is also wrong. Incremental cost is the cost that was realized because of a decision.
A listing agreement is a contract between the property proprietor and the estate broker. The listing agreement must have been an exclusive right to sell.
<h3>What is Exclusive Right-to-Sell Listing Agreement?</h3>
An Exclusive Right-to-Sell Listing Agreement is one of the types of listing agreement that is a contract signed by the broker and the owner. The broker acts as an agent that has been involved in sales.
The owner has to pay a commission to the broker even if the sales were not through the agent during the time period of the contractual agreement. The property in the time period cannot be listed with another broker.
Therefore, the listing agreement is Exclusive Right-to-Sell.
Learn more about exclusive right-to-sell, here:
brainly.com/question/14364124
#SPJ4
Answer: No.
Explanation: Based on the initial agreement made between Champs Tee shirt company and Barry's sport shop, which was the de sealed for the purchase of 200 shirts at a price of 100. Even though additional demand of 100 t-shirts was made, Champs decided to send 200. Barry will be unable to force Champs to send the additional 100 because the transaction was made and agreed on verbally without any written. or signed document which could be tendered as evidence when trying to force Champs to send the additional 100
