Answer:
Prescriptive analytics.
Explanation:
Prescriptive analytics can be defined as a type of data analysis model which typically comprises of descriptive data and forecasting techniques used for identifying the decisions that are most likely to yield an optimum or best performance.
Hence, prescriptive analytics is a data analysis model that use optimization techniques.
For example, prescribing a car that is capable of finding the best route for a road trip.
Answer:
2.23 is the price earnings ratio.
Explanation:
Firstly we must find the Earnings per share for this problem as it is needed to calculate the price earnings ratio so earnings per share = (Net income)/(Number of shares outstanding).
we are given net income of $401000 then to obtain number of shares outstanding for 2015 are $267000/$10 as we saw the company's common stock account balance all year long was that value of which each share has a par value of $10, then we get outstanding shares which are 26700 now we calculate the earnings per share (EPS) by using the above formula with substituting the above mentioned values :
Earnings Per Share= $401000/26700
= $15.01872659
now we will use the Price Earnings Ratio formula which is
Price Earnings Ratio = (current share price)/(earnings per share )
we have been given a current share price of $33.50 now we will use the earnings per share which was calculated above.
Price Earnings Ratio = $33.50/$15.01872659
= 2.230548628 then we round off the answer to two decimal places
Price Earnings Ratio = 2.23
Answer:
This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.
Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.
We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.
But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.
If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.
False, they are meant to contain accidents if they happen. They are suuuuper important to have around though!!
