Answer:
They can give more life assignments
Explanation:
<em>The options are:</em>
a. Change behavior
b. Positive deconfirmation
c. Negative mouth to mouth
d. Confirmatory bias
Answer:
The correct answer is c) Negative mouth to mouth.
Explanation:
When talking about the negative mouth to mouth, reference is made to the information that is transferred from one person to another about the quality of a product, the negative mouth to mouth is when a customer complains about the conditions of the product obtained in the store.
This can damage the credibility of the company that receives criticism and can influence the decisions of potential buyers.
As it is in the case of Matt is dissatisfied with the product he bought, every time he tells his story, he will give his opinion of considering other brands, managing to consciously and unconsciously influence the person so as not to buy in that store.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
The picture on the screen.
Explanation:
André Bazin was a well-known, celebrated and influential French film critic and film philosopher. His writing journey started about film in 1943 and he was the co-founder of the popular film magazine Cahiers du cinéma in the year 1951, alongside Joseph-Marie Lo Duca and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze.
He used his term presence to describe the moviegoer's sense that he is within the same spatial/temporal continuum as the picture on the screen.
Answer:
The indigenous people were treated as horribly by the colonizers. The colonizers believed that the Native Americans stood in their way so they harmed and in slaved them.
Explanation:
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.