How did poor intellectual property laws benefit the United States during the Industrial Revolution?

1 answer:

4 0

International piracy of intellectual property rights has emerged as one of the most important foreign policy issues for many industrialized countries, particularly the United States. U.S. companies have suffered greatly from the lack of rigorous and uniform international standards for intellectual property rights. The absence of intellectual property laws in developing countries costs U.S. firms one dollar for every three dollars of revenue gained from exported products, PhRMA, Opportunities and Challenges for Pharmaceutical Innovation 3 (1996), while inadequate international enforcement of existing laws is estimated to cost U.S. industry up to $80 billion per year. Report of the United States Trade Representative's Intergovernmental Policy Advisory Committee (IGPAC) to the Congress of the United States on the Agreements Reached in the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations 22 (1994).

You might be interested in

Income tax evasion, embezzlement, and bribery are examples of __________. Group of answer choices White-collar crime Victimless

xeze [42]

Answer:

White Collar Crimes

Explanation:

White-collar crimes refers to financially motivated, nonviolent or non directly violent crime committed by individuals, businesses and government professionals.

5 0

2 years ago

the fall of tenochititlan is significant because 1: it ended the aztec empire 2:it ended the inca empire 3:it established a spai

Gwar [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

It was significant because it helped Spain gain control over a colony in the America's, which later came to be the colony of New Spain.

7 0

3 years ago

The English music star Morrissey got his start in the band The Smiths, singing about radical vegetarianism and bisexuality in th

Feliz [49]

Answer:

c. They bring different interpretive strategies to the experience of listening to Morrissey's music

Explanation:

Music is enjoyed by a varied audience because interpretation to music is subjective and a single piece of music may have different impart or interpretation to different people. This is the reason why it is possible for individuals to totally enjoy a music even though they have no understanding of what the artist is saying. To the British teenagers, they may enjoy his music because he is British or a sense of patriotism why the Hispanic Californians may enjoy it for a totally different reason.

3 0

3 years ago

What was the argument in the Dred Scott case

Kamila [148]

Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.

Explanation:

Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.

Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following best fits the definition of loose constructionism

ss7ja [257]

Answer:

An expansive understanding of powers granted to the federal government is the correct answer.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago