What I think he means is that the bystanders knew what was happening but didn't stand up for it. They didn't fight for the Jews rights. But in my opinion that statement is wrong since anyone who stood up or defended the Jews would be killed.
the correct answers are "They think they'll come marching back, somehow, just as gay as they went", "some of those foreigners, that weren't there because they had any say about it, but because they had to be there, poor wretches", and "You thought it would be all right for my George, your George, to kill the sons of those miserable mothers and the husbands of those girls that you would never see the faces of."
(I was the one who asked this question, i just made a second account to answer it because i answered the question just now and then got it right)
Answer:
the answer is inductive reasoning
It would be simile because it contains like
Answer: Albert Martin included that anecdote to show that even an experienced fire chief was disturbed and affected about what he saw even though he was used to see fires. He took the mouse because it was the only survivor. He was happy that at least something got to survive. This anecdote about fire chief Crocker bringing home a mouse from the remains of the fire serves to remind the reader that even someone like Fire Chief Crocker who was incredibly experienced in fires and had seen many tragedies in his time was very disturbed and bothered by the Triangle Fire.
Explanation: I hoped i helped :)
