The negative trait of Armida that irritated her friend was possessiveness, as shown in option B in the first question. The lesson Armida learned from the chicks was that if a chick is held too tightly, he will fight, as shown in option D.
<h3>What happened to Armida?</h3>
- She took friendship very seriously.
- She was possessive of her friend.
- She didn't allow her friend to have other interests.
Armida proved to be a very suffocating friend. She was possessive of her friend and wanted that friend to always live up to what she wanted. This caused her friend to move away, which made her very sad.
When playing with chicks, she understood that if she holds a chick too tightly, the chick will pull away from her, just as she did with her friend.
More information about friendships at the link:
brainly.com/question/26627248
Hello. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. In the meantime I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to know the implicit morality of a story after reading it. However, we know that the moral of a story is a teaching that the story wants to pass on to the reader. Implicit morality, on the other hand, is also a teaching, but it is transmitted to the reader in a subjective and indirect way, but noticeable.
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
If everything of them is valid throughout this situation, we look throughout the whole statement in which you have to justify if they decide that's it's right. They now need four different ideas to support your concept. In this, we need to thoughts about it but if you throw it into a tough bill, I'm happy in seeing your response.
B- Southerners: the north thought the states should just have been slave free
