Which is the most likely reason the framers of the Constitution did not tell the judicial branch how to interpret the document?

Social Studies

2 answers:

fiasKO [112]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

They wanted the judicial branch to reach its own conclusions.

Explanation:

egoroff_w [7]3 years ago

4 0

The most likely reason the framers of the Constitution did not tell the judicial branch how to interpret the document is that THEY WANTED THE JUDICIAL BRANCH TO REACH ITS OWN CONCLUSIONS.

Each branches of the government have their own roles in the government as specified in the Constitution. The legislative branch's role is to make laws, the executive branch's role is to implement the laws, and the judicial branch's role is to review the laws passed and assess whether it is in adherence to the constitution without bias. In this way, check and balance among the branches is performed.

You might be interested in

True or false Physical and social mobility is limited in the rural areas.

Temka [501]

Answer:

<h3> i think its False </h3>

Mark me as brainlist 

5 0

3 years ago

How do you think the government can ensure that every human being survives despite of his economic status?

Marrrta [24]

Answer: Government is bound to provide health facilities to sustain good health of people of the society.

Explanation:

The government takes measures to bring equality in terms of healthy life style irrespective of the socioeconomic status of the members of the population.

1. The government ensures that people who are under low economic status may receive the health cover.

2. There are special health insurance scheme which poor people can afford easily.

3. There is special wards for people with low economic status to avail treatment in super speciality hospitals.

4. Free medication ensures that every patient can receive medicine.

3 0

3 years ago

the government of india has,since independence ,taken several steps to put an end to casteism in india. do you think that discri

viva [34]

Actually, I only have an anecdotal evidence: from my personal experience.

I know a person who described her friendship with a person from a lower caste and how hard it was for the person from the smaller caste to get a better job precisely because everyone though that she is supposed to do only lower-tier jobs, as people of her caste "should".

The discrimination is still very much present: it's really hard to overcome a very old prejudice in people: people still perceive people of lower casts as "less worthy".

If this was not the caste, the regular support from the government for the lower castes (for example reserved seats at the universities) would be discontinued. (this is an example you can use: the government still thinks it's necessary to help the lower castes, if there was no more discrimination, they would have stopped).

3 0

3 years ago

Conflict between which groups of people have led to war in Lebanon

marishachu [46]

Israel and Arab States.

4 0

3 years ago

Any contract to commit a crime is in of a statute and therefore unenforceable. A contract to sell illegal drugs in violation of

White raven [17]

Answer:

unenforceable

Explanation:

An unenforceable contract is any contract that is aimed at committing a crime such as selling of drugs, smuggling of goods and any other thing like those which is against the law.

Such contract cannot be enforced because it is albinitio in support or an illegal venture or activity.

7 0

3 years ago