Answer:
The first sentence because he is not playing and getting things done, and the last sentence because it takes focus to recount things, Hope this helps, please mark me brainliest.
Explanation:
Nick makes a good narrator
because he tends to be the unbiased party. He can be considered reliable
because many of the character choose to trust him. He also depicts a character
of a well-educated and honest narrator. He is an average person, which allow
him to make connections with the audience. Just like one of lines in the story
where he said, “You see I usually find myself among strangers because I drift
here and there trying to forget the sad thing that happened to me.”,
which is a familiar experience in true-life. On the other hand, he is an unreliable
narrator because of the fact that, even though he claims to be non-judgmental,
he lets his judgments of people be swayed by his own standards and expectations
and misstate his descriptions.
Answer: A. Simile: A comparison between two unlike things using words such as: like, as, than, similar to, resembles, etc.
Yea Ty AcidOmega :)))))))
'Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant.' is the part that represents the central point of Wiesel's Nobel Prize acceptance speech.
<h3>What is an acceptance speech?</h3>
A speech, which is delivered by a speaker at the time of accepting an honorary memento, or an award for extraordinary achievements, it is known as acceptance speech.
Hence, option B holds true regarding Wiesel's speech during the acceptance of the Nobel Prize. The complete question has been attached as an image.
Learn more about an acceptance speech here:
brainly.com/question/10404236
#SPJ1
