1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aneli [31]
3 years ago
15

Would a rider be likely to be attached to a bill proposing abolishing the federal income tax and the Internal Revenue Service wh

y or why not
History
1 answer:
dusya [7]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is yes. Unfortunately, riders are used both by Republicans and Democrats. Republicans use it mostly to pass a controversial or unpopular provision that would not pass otherwise. Democrats use it mostly to prevent unpopular or controversial bills to pass. Riders have nothing to do with the actual bill and in a sense they hijack the law-making process for the sake of partisanship.

Now, let’s analyze the situation at hand: there is a bill that has been proposed by either party for the specific purpose of abolishing the federal income tax and the Internal Revenue Service. Such a bill is a highly controversial issue since without tax revenues and an enforcing institution the federal government would be bankrupt unless it finds alternate way of getting funds to operate.

It is certain that either party would attach a rider to make sure that the bill to never pass. Democrats would most likely attach a rider imposing strict gun control laws or universal, public health care for all Americans. Republicans would most likely attach a bill to eliminate all taxes on the wealthy or all regulation on financial markets. Both parties would definitely use the technique if the bill displeases their own ideology.


You might be interested in
Which two of the following are a direct effects of the September 11 attacks?
kow [346]
He killing of Osama Bin Laden and the USA Patriot Act is the answer to your question.
4 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply.
wlad13 [49]
Alexander the Great didn't conquer Italy. Neither did he conquer China.

Alexander the Great was the leader of the hellenistic period in Greece and contributed to the creation of one of the greatest empires at the time which was spanning all around from the Greek peninsula all the way to Mesopotamia. 
5 0
3 years ago
What does Tao Te Ching teach?
inysia [295]

Answer: c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best completes the table?
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

D were very religious

Explanation:

i did the test

8 0
3 years ago
S. Which of the following problems was the civil rights movement most effective in solving? (1 point)
labwork [276]

Answer:

The segregation of wealthy suburban neighborhoods outside of metropolitan areas.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • why is it historically significant that we have less information about early chinese civilizations than about civilizations from
    10·1 answer
  • Which US president first explained the domino theory, which was concerned with the expansion of communism in Southeast Asia?
    14·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST PLUS 20 POINTS!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP IM BEGGING
    6·2 answers
  • Who invaded Constantinople in 1453?
    11·2 answers
  • How did isolationism act as a deterrent to U.S. participation in the war?
    12·2 answers
  • What type of music became popular in the 1920's
    11·2 answers
  • Rain is a(n)<br> component of an ecosystem.<br> Biotic <br> Living <br> abiotic <br> Unimportant
    14·2 answers
  • Check all that apply.
    10·1 answer
  • Why did slavery become a permanent condition​
    8·1 answer
  • The United States refused to participate in which international
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!