Question

A candidate running for President is meeting with some potential wealthy donors later today. These donors have millions of dollars that they are considering contributing to help the candidate win. Federal Election Commission restrictions prevent them from contributing the millions that they want to spend. Following the decision of Citizens United v. FEC, what strategy should the donors take to help the candidate's campaign with as much money as possible?
Group of answer choices

A. The donors can contribute unlimited cash donations to political parties via the "soft money" loophole.

B. The wealthy donors can organize a Super PAC, contribute their money to the Super PAC, and organize the PAC to create ads to support the candidate without working with their campaign directly

C. They will only be allowed to donate the individual maximum to support the candidate

D. They will be able to donate $5,000 to a PAC, which can then donate that money directly to the candidate's campaign

Answer 1

The inference is that the thing that should be done is B. The wealthy donors can organize a Super PAC, contribute their money to the Super PAC, and organize the PAC to create ads to support the candidate without working with their campaign directly.

What is an inference?

It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced from the information given.

In this case, such funding isn't allowed and therefore, the wealthy donors can organize a Super PAC, contribute their money to the Super PAC, and organize the PAC to create ads to support the candidate without working with their campaign directly.

Learn more about inference on:

brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ1