1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeX [460]
3 years ago
5

1 WE Why do political parties try to elect candidates to office?

History
1 answer:
erma4kov [3.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

See explanation

Explanation:

So the people they elect can hopefully carry out what they want.

You might be interested in
Who do i contact about not being able to upload a photo in this question?
max2010maxim [7]
Contact Brainly





In like the helping button
3 0
3 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of the Watergate scandal on the 1972 election
Luda [366]

Answer:

President Richard Nixon defeated Democratic Senator George McGovern of South Dakota.

Explanation:

The effect of the Watergate scandal can be seen by the resignation of President Nixon this happened the first time in the history of America, even congress pass the new laws to limit the presidential powers.

later, Nixon claimed he was treated in a wrong way on the Watergate scandal he was doing for the sake of the country, his statements helped him in winning the 1972 presidential elections.

4 0
3 years ago
Who was the 5th president of the US?
Vilka [71]

Answer: James Monroe

Hope that helped :)

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the ruling class during the middle ages? *
jok3333 [9.3K]
Patricians I think jfbdonavakdbdyw
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Would a slave owner in the south want slaves counted as population for voting purposes
    7·1 answer
  • How did the change in Spanish policy affect American farmers in the west? (When Spain changed it's policies toward American good
    8·2 answers
  • Where did post-war decolonization occur?<br><br> Any help will be appreciated thank you! ☺️
    15·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE YOU A BRELANIT
    8·2 answers
  • What was the difference between the political systems in the United States and the Soviet Union?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain Missouri Compromise
    8·1 answer
  • Which aspect of Bantu civilization was most affected by iron technology
    12·2 answers
  • Due to high average rainfall and superior farming conditions, in which region did the Old Three Hundred
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement below completes the diagram about John Locke's view of the social contract?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the intended audience for president john f Kennedys inaugural address
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!