All categories

4 years ago

What makes DHTML different from HTML?

Advanced Placement (AP)

2 answers:

bixtya [17]4 years ago

8 0

HTML is a mark-up language, while DHTML is a collection of technology.

DHTML creates dynamic web pages, whereas HTML creates static web pages.

DHTML allows including small animations and dynamic menus in Web pages.

DHML used events, methods, properties to insulate dynamism in HTML Pages.

DHML is basically using JavaScript and style sheets in an HTML page.

HTML sites will be slow upon client-side technologies, while DHTML sites will be fast enough upon client-side technologies.

HTML creates a plain page without any styles and Scripts called as HTML. Whereas, DHTML creates a page with HTML, CSS, DOM and Scripts called as DHTML.

HTML cannot have any server side code but DHTML may contain server side code.

In HTML, there is no need for database connectivity, but DHTML may require connecting to a database as it interacts with user.

HTML files are stored with .htm or .html extension, while DHTML files are stored with .dhtm extension.

HTML does not require any processing from browser, while DHTML requires processing from browser which changes its look and feel.

hope this helps:)sorry if it doesnt

plz mark brainliest

Korolek [52]4 years ago

3 0

HTML creates static web pages by the use of text and images

DHTML creates dynamic web pages with the use of CSS

You might be interested in

Examples of fast-moving consumer goods are

MakcuM [25]

Answer:

• newspapers

• Frozen prepared meals

Explanation:

Fast-moving consumer goods, are also called consumer packaged goods. They are the products which are sold quickly and they're usually cheap.

Examples of fast-moving consumer goods are non-durable household goods like frozen prepared meals, toiletries, cosmetics, packaged foods, beverages, candies, etc. They also have low profit margin. Based on the examples given above, the answer are newspapers and frozen prepared meals.

8 0

3 years ago

Comparison: How did the patterns of settlement differ among the Spanish, English, French, and Dutch immigrants?

SashulF [63]

Spanish settlement began in the early 16th century and was a massive and intensive enterprise organized, subsidized and overseen by the Spanish Crown, whereas English, Dutch and French settlement of the New World began about a hundred years after the Spanish effort and was a more timid and tentative affair; for instance, when the first successful English settlement in North America was founded —Jamestown colony in present-day Virginia in 1607— the Spanish colony of Puerto Rico had had governors and organized governments for a hundred years and when the Pilgrims landed in Plymouth rock in present-day Massachusetts in 1620, Puerto Rico’s capital city of San Juan was celebrating its first century of existence. English settlement patterns changed substantially later on and the Thirteen Colonies were very successful enterprises but in other parts of the New World the English —or British— built upon Spanish success. Jamaica was founded as a SPANISH colony and remained one until the British conquered it in the late 17th century; Trinidad was founded as a SPANISH colony until the British conquered it in 1797 during the French Revolutionary Wars. Florida also started out as a Spanish colony, was taken over by the British at the end of the Seven years War (1756–1763), was returned to Spain at the end of the American Revolution —in payment for Spain’s assistance to the Americans— and was purchased by the US from Spain in 1819. Belize —British Honduras— was founded on marginal land that the Spanish Crown didn’t really care for in Central America. The Dutch concerned themselves with much smaller settlements in the Lesser Antilles and Dutch Guiana —present day Suriname— and the French, even though they settled over a much larger area, comprising Canada and the Louisiana territory, did not treat human settlement over such a large area with the same energy and dedication that the British did, such that by the time of the Seven Years War —known in the US and Canada as the “French and Indian War”— the entire European population of ALL of French Canada —not counting Native Americans— was only 80,000 and that for the Louisiana territory —again, not counting Native Americans— was perhaps another 20,000 AT MOST—at a time when the Thirteen (British) colonies in North America had a total population of two and a half million.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of hubbie’s findings supported the Big Bang theory? Check all that apply

poizon [28]

Answer:

There are billions of galaxies in the universe, not just one.
The universe formed from a central point.
Most galaxies in the universe are moving away from Earth.

Explanation:

Hubble's theory is a model of the observable universe and represents the earliest form of evolution of the universe in the form of a big bang. The process of large-scale evolution and origin and growth of the universe.

It explains the development of the universe from an ingle bang where all the galaxies spread and are still growing further apart from each other.

It explains the formation of the university from a single point in the history of time. It also explains the formation of galaxies in the universe such as those of the spiral and elliptical ones. How the galaxies and planets came into the formation from this one single point.

8 0

3 years ago

100 points if you answer correctly!

vitfil [10]

Explanation:

orbital launch vehicles

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

__________ of injuries on farms are the result of working with livestock, the majority of which involve horses or cattle.

PtichkaEL [24]

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb