I trust “<u>Source 1</u>”
<u>Explanation</u>:
I would trust the Source 1 i.e., the “Sworn testimony by American Sergeant in Congressional hearings in 1969” more because a sworn testimony is a gold evidence for the Congressional hearings. It won’t affect a person i.e., the Sergeant in any way. Maybe the testimony can get corrupted by lying, forcing and constraining, and the shaking the human memory. But in a speech by the General can affect his reputation as he can hid the truth and lie in his speech. So, the sworn testimony is more reliable than the speech.
Answer:
it didn't change
Explanation:
war is war just because the U.S. got involved doesn't mean it changed
Socrates was charged of not honoring the gods of Athens and of corrupting the youth. He received the death sentence for<em> mora</em>l <em>corruption </em>and <em>impiety</em>. His refusal to escape was because:
1 - to flee would idicate a fear of death, which he didn't have.
2 - escaping would make his friends liable in law.
3 - this could cause him to break his "social contract" with the state, and he didn't want to harm the state.
Answer:
The Answer is below
Explanation:
Given that Coin serves as a medium of exchange and its design often comprised the portraits of the leaders of a particular place or region in which the coin is being circulated as a medium of exchange. This help to reveal the name of such leaders. Other Information that may be revealed through the Coin are:
1. Dates or period in which the coin is utilized
2. Dress mode of the leader depicts the dressing style or culture of the people during the period.
3. The material for the coin shows the materials of value of that period and region
Hence, it is TRUE that, Coins are interesting artefacts and provide historians with valuable information about the culture, leadership, and important symbolism of the historical periods in which they were produced
