This is the answer this is the answer this is the answer this is the answer
After a case has been granted certiorari which is when four Justices agree to review a case it is then the justices may decide against further review of the case. They can review a case an decide to dismiss it if Court may feel the case presented during oral arguments did not present the constitutional issues in a clear-cut way. In this event the writ of certiorari is "dismissed as improvidently granted" (DIG)—saying, in effect that the Court should not have accepted the case. Harsh right XD
The Supreme Court accepts 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year. - Us courts website claims this number
The Intolerable Acts was the<span> term used by American Patriots for a series of punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 </span>after<span> the Boston Tea Party.
</span>
Answer: D
Explanation: An extraordinary amount of things had changed on this decade. The Democratic-Republicans had essentially expanded the old Anti-Federalist alliance. Above all, urban specialists and craftsmen who had bolstered the Constitution amid sanction and who had generally upheld Adams in 1796 currently joined the Jeffersonians. Additionally, key pioneers like James Madison had changed his political position by 1800.
Madison presently rose as the ablest party coordinator among the Republicans. At base, the Democratic-Republicans trusted that administration should have been comprehensively responsible to the general population. Their alliance and beliefs would overwhelm American governmental issues well into the nineteenth century.
