Answer:
2) all of the partners in proportion to their shares of the profits
Explanation:
Partnership refers to a mutual agreement between two or more individuals, deciding to carry on a business and share it's risks and rewards in the profit sharing ratio as stipulated, or as provided in the partnership deed.
Upon retirement or death of any of the partners, the partnership is said to have been dissolved. Upon dissolution, the profits and losses arising consequently shall be shared by the remaining partners in their profit sharing ratio. A firm may decide to voluntarily dissolve too.
In the given case, upon dissolution, liabilities exceed assets and thus indicate a loss.
This loss shall be borne by all of the partners in their profit sharing ratio and not in the ratio of their capitals.
Answer:
C. $49,600.
Explanation:
We can find the net cash provided by operating activities using the information given to us in the question. We will start from net income which is $43,000 and then add 5,800 to it because it is a current asset which is decreasing which means that the company received cash for it, then we will subtract 1,900 because it is an increase in inventory and we assume the company paid cash for it because there are no increase in accounts payable, and then we will add 2,700 because depreciation is a non cash expense, therefore we will add it back when we calculate the cash provided by operating activities.
43,000+ 5,800-1,900+2,700=49,600
Answer:
i guess you can but don't post any valid information which might expose credit cards or so forth
Advertising would be something over the world or state country etc that many people will see something that is advertised on tv or a bill board, personal selling would be something that your showing off on your on like on ebay etc that isnt sponsered by any companys and is for your own doing . Hope this helped ! (:
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
