1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andriy [413]
2 years ago
15

During the constitutional convention of 1787,geogre mason argued?

History
1 answer:
Paha777 [63]2 years ago
7 0
<span>Building a constitution. Although the Annapolis Convention saw only about a dozen delegates attend, representing only five states, it called for a meeting to be held in Philadelphia in May 1787, to devise amendments to the Articles of Confederation which would result in a more durable constitutional arrangement.
Hope this helps!!
Plz give me the brainliest</span>
You might be interested in
PLEASE HURRY AND HELP
lesantik [10]

The sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries changed the world in dramatic ways. But probably, the biggest change the world saw or has ever seen, was the finding and conquest of the Americas. Many are the theories as to what led both the Spanish and Portuguese empires to seek these voyages, but the truth of the matter is that the main reasons that pushed Spain to support Cristopher Columbus in his trip in 1492 were, first, the desire to discover and open new trade routes to the Indies. And the second reason was evangelization, which the two Spanish moarchs believed would be empowered by colonization.

When the Spanish first arrived in the Americas, their first encounter was not with any big Native tribes or settled civilizations. It was not until later on, in 1519, that the Spanish encountered true Native American civilization. And the first to find this was Hernán Cortés, who between 1519 and 1521, led a war against the Aztec Empire, one of the biggest and most important of the entire continent. The Aztecs were settled in the Gulf of Mexico, in what is today Mexico itself. The Aztecs, led by Moctezuma II were really advanced people, with a federal-like way of government, cities, technology and an organized society. But like all well-organized and advanced societies, problems arose. The first was that through contact with the Spanish, many diseases unknown until then diminished the number of Natives and also because of weaponry, which allowed the Spanish to finally overcome the Aztec forces.

The second empire was the Inca Empire, in what is today Peru, specifically in Cusco. Unlike its sister empire in Mexico, the Incas did not have wheeled vehicles and they did not use farm animals. They did not have a currency and they survived on exchange of goods, instead of a market. What made them really advanced was their ability in masonry and the use of stone. Their architecture was really advanced and like the Aztecs, their cities were impressive. They also had a centralized system of government led by a king, who at the time of the arrival of the Conquistadors was Atahualpa and the king was considered the owner of everything within the empire. They also had a very advanced system of roads that connected the central city of Machu Picchu with the rest of the Empire. It was Francisco Pizarro who in 1526 moved from Panama to the Andean region and found himself at Machu Picchu. After several trips, finally, between 1532 and 1533, Francisco Pizarro and the Spanish were able to take control of the vast Inca Empire.

In the end, most of the Americas, save what is nowadays Brazil, that ended in the hands of Portugal, became part of the enormous Spanish Empire. The result was a group of colonies from which the Spanish derived the precious metal of gold and which made them really rich. The Natives, at first were enslaved by the Spanish until through intervention of the Church, black people were brought in to prevent the death of the Natives. Disease also decimated the Native population in the Americas. There was a lot of racial mixing betwen the Spanish and Natives, which gave origin to many new skin colors, typical of Spanish America.  

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role did the Spanish colonial caste system play in early 19th-century
Mrac [35]

Spanish colonial caste system ensured that people of mixed race would wield the most power in early 19th-century revolutions.

The Caste System was made in colonial times to clarify blended race families to those back in Spain, but this racial progression remained input long after the Spanish had cleared out Latin America. The system was made by the Spanish to preserve their control and the prevalence of other racial bunches within the colonies. Within the colonial time, the Spanish American society had a pyramidal caste system with several Spaniards at the best, mixed-race within the centre, a huge populace of inborn individuals, and a little number of slaves as a rule of African beginning at the foot.

The Spaniards possessed the upper echelons of colonial society by holding all the positions of financial benefit and political control. In this way, there was a preparation for caste amalgamation, composed of generally uniform human sorts in traditions, thoughts, and social status, which would quicken more amid the Spanish-American Wars of Freedom. A social progression ruled at the beat was shaped by the "Spaniards"

Read more about the Spanish colonial caste system on:

brainly.com/question/10605531

#SPJ1

3 0
9 months ago
How did the cold war led to conflict
Bogdan [553]
 the Cold War is a conflict between the Communist nations led by the Soviet Union and the democratic nations led by the United States. The Cold War was a state of geopolitical tension after World War II between powers in the Eastern Bloc the Soviet Union and its satellite states and powers in the Western Block the United States  its nato allies and others. Historians do not fully agree on the dates, but a common timeframe is the period between 1947  the year the Truman Doctrine a US foreign policy pledging to aid nations threatened by Soviet expansionism was announced and 1991 the year the Soviet Union fell.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the U.S. could have avoided the Civil War, or do you think it was inevitable / unavoidable? Please explain your ans
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

I believe it was not possible to avoid the civil war. If it was avoidable, the north and south would have split into two different countries. Since the two are right next to each other, there would have been constant clashes and disagreements. The southern white would have not cooperate with the north to negotiate giving any slaves rights. As I said, war could have been pushed aside, back ultimately come back as the heat between the north and south would be much greater, creating a much more bloodier of a war than it was originally.

8 0
2 years ago
The term domestic feminism during the fi rst half of the 19th century could
irga5000 [103]
The term domestic feminism during the first half of the 19th century could
best be defined as "<span>(A) women adopting a more assertive role in the home," since prior to this men had almost always been considered to be the "head" of the household. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did events in England affect the New England colonies' development?
    9·1 answer
  • How old exactly is the earth? 14.8 billion years? I'm not exactly sure
    11·2 answers
  • Who were the first to replace the barter system with a coin system ?
    12·2 answers
  • Please help meeee!!!...
    12·1 answer
  • What negative impact did gold and silver mining have n the west?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the 22nd president of united states
    7·1 answer
  • What was one reason for the victory of the communists over the nationalist in china 1949
    9·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!!! HURRY!!
    10·1 answer
  • What was the outcome when white league members captured republican leaders in coushatta?
    11·2 answers
  • Where was Sir Francis Drake born?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!