1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Finger [1]
4 years ago
6

What did Chief Watie and Chief Ross disagree over regarding freedmen?

History
2 answers:
GaryK [48]4 years ago
6 0
<span>Aftermath. One year later, however, in Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), theU.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.</span><span>
</span>
AleksandrR [38]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answer to the question: What did Chief Watie and Chief Ross disagree over regarding freedmen, would be: whether freedmen were to be granted citizenship to the Cherokee Nation, and whether they should be granted rights, properties and lands, just like any other Cherokee.

Explanation:

Slavery of African Americans was not just an issue of whether a person was white, or Native American. The truth is that both whites and Native Americans, especially those members of the Cherokee nation, were slaveholders. Funnily enough, statistics show that at some points, the Cherokee had more slaves than even whites in some states. However, at the end of Civil War, and under force by the U.S government, the Cherokee from the North faction, led by Principal Chief John Ross and those of the South, led by Chief Stand Watie, met. While the group of the North agreed with their Union counterparts that slavery should be ended, and freedmen should be granted full rights as citizens of the Cherokee Nation, those from the South were willing to free slaves, but these were to be moved from Cherokee territory and placed on U.S territory. In the end, John Ross´s proposal was the one accepted, and the treaty was signed.

You might be interested in
Among the lroquois, <br> what was the purpose of a mourning war
Law Incorporation [45]
They do it because it helps restore spirituality vitality of Iroquois nations. it was fought for vengeance  
6 0
4 years ago
What makes fundamentalism different from other religious expressions??
Oksana_A [137]
Fundamentalism usually has a religious connotation that indicates unwavering attachment to a set of irreducible beliefs. but sometimes, fundamentalism has come to be applied a tendency among certain groups, mainly though not exclusively, in religion. that is characterized by a markedly strict literalism.
8 0
3 years ago
What was Booth’s original plan to save the Confederacy? <br><br><br> Why did it fail?
VashaNatasha [74]

Answer:

I think it was to kill Lincoln

Explanation:

He wanted to abduct Lincoln, take him to Richmond and exchange him for Confederate soldiers then held in Union prisons. 

6 0
3 years ago
As result of world of war 1 what happened to the foreign colonies held by European powers
nataly862011 [7]

Answer: The mandate system authorized a member nation of the League of Nations to govern a former German or Turkish colonial area after the conclusion of World War I.  


Context/detail:

When World War I erupted, the Ottoman Empire sided with Germany as part of the "Central Powers."  In the end, the Central Powers lost and the Turkish  empire of the Ottomans ceased to exist as an empire.  Turkey remained as a country, but it lost control over other territories that it had held before.  Germany was stripped of its overseas colonial holdings.

The League of Nations created a system for governing former German and Ottoman territories, called "the mandate system."  There were mandate territories for former German territories in Africa and Asia, as well for former Ottoman territories in the Middle East.  

The former Turkish provinces of Syria, Iraq and Palestine in the Middle East were divided into a French mandate territory and British mandate territory. The British mandate rule over Palestine has much to do with the history of the development of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

7 0
4 years ago
Which definition of the term abolition is correct?
Katyanochek1 [597]
C should be the answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Free pointssssssssssssssss
    11·2 answers
  • What animal was the main object of the inland fur trade?
    15·1 answer
  • For which of the following activities were the Sons of Liberty responsible?
    7·1 answer
  • The key factor in the decision of the U.S. to enter World War I was
    8·1 answer
  • Byzantium looked to the west for cultural inspiration. TrueFalse
    7·2 answers
  • Which three regions on the map did Alexander The Great conquer?
    10·2 answers
  • What was Hitler's plan for building the third Reich?
    7·1 answer
  • What amendment required the direct election of US Senators?​
    6·2 answers
  • The social scientist most likely to read the text on ancient Chinese oracle bones would be
    15·1 answer
  • How did geography shape the development of the Anasazi civilizations?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!