1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergeinik [125]
3 years ago
9

In case of Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court held that freedom of speech means more than just words. Cute an example of symbol

ic speech? Do you agree that the First Amendment should protect this kind of symbolic speech? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
sergey [27]3 years ago
8 0

The Supreme Court case Texas vs. Johnson established the freedom of speech can apply to more than just words. For example, in this case, the Supreme Court ruled  that the burning of the American flag is protected under the first amendment of the US Constitution.

It is important that nonverbal elements of freedom of speech are protected, as it allows citizens to voice their concerns with societal issues or government actions in a variety of ways. Along with this, if the government starts to restrict some freedom of speech, it could continue to limit other forms of free speech until citizens rights are severely restricted.

You might be interested in
The great distance from America made it difficult for ____to govern the colonies.
Marianna [84]

Answer:

England

Explanation:

hope this helps!!!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The set of countries with the greatest population densities are
Ilya [14]

Answer:

I think it's a

6 0
2 years ago
In what city was martin luther king assassinated in 1968?
kramer

Memphis Tennessee

i live in Tennessee so im pretty sure this is right :3

5 0
3 years ago
Name the three branches of the government
seraphim [82]
Executive,legislative,judicial
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the lives of blacks in south africa restricted by the apartheid laws?
soldier1979 [14.2K]
<span>Apartheid, the Afrikaans’ word for segregation, brought white supremacy to a whole new level as the rest of the continent was decolonizing following World War II. The National Party government treated non-whites as second class citizens and in the case of Africans, non-citizens. By confining Africans to the ‘homelands’ of Bantus tans, the National Party was able to justify stripping away any basic rights Africans had in the country of South Africa. The international community refused to recognize these homelands, and pressure eventually began to build from all sides to allow equal rights for all residents of South Africa. Pressure came in the form of economic sanctions, expulsions from international organizations, and the divestment of foreign companies.</span><span />
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the goals of the bourbon triunirate
    14·1 answer
  • What impact did Philip II and Louis XIV have on the economies of their nations?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these BEST explains the importance in Georgia history of the Charter of 1732?
    11·1 answer
  • What impact did the policies of the renaissance popes have on the Catholic Church?
    8·1 answer
  • How did jim crow laws poll taxes and literacy tests affect blacks?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is it easy for people to traffic illicit drugs through Canada?
    6·1 answer
  • Who is the central figure that begins Christianity
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the president of the United States when the War 1 ended
    14·2 answers
  • How did world war 2 change the balance of power
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the Historical and Geographic Context that led to the event by answering the context questions: WHEN, WHERE, WHO, WHAT,
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!